- From: Timothy Chien <timdream@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:57:12 +0800
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
- Cc: Hironori Bono <hbono@google.com>, WebApps Working Group <public-webapps@w3.org>, SUN Haitao <sunhaitao@devtaste.com>
Kenny, Thanks for the correction, just want to say I am sure that Changjie radicals are NOT phonetics. It is correct to put them in section 3.1.2 Tim On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu> wrote: > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ime-api/raw-file/default/use-cases/Overview.html > > SUN Haitao found the description of the Traditional Chinese IME used as > an example in this use cases document somewhat inaccurate. > > 3.1.2 Radical composer > ______________________ > > # typing ‘o’ produces ‘人’ on a Traditional-Chinese (or Bopomofo) > # keyboard > > s/Bopomofo/Changjie/ > > (It's not clear to me if Changjie radicals are phonetic but I am totally > ignorant on this subject) > > 3.2 Converter > _____________ > > # Bopomofo characters ‘人弓’ matches Traditional-Chinese > # ideographic characters ‘乞’, ‘亿’, ‘亇’, etc. > > s/Bopomofo characters/Changjie components/ > > > > Cheers, > Kenny >
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 11:02:12 UTC