- From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:50:30 +0900
- To: olli@pettay.fi
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, ext Satish S <satish@google.com>, Peter Beverloo <peter@chromium.org>, Glen Shires <gshires@google.com>, public-webapps@w3.org, public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>, 2012-01-09 18:12 +0200: > It doesn't matter too much to me in which group the API will be developed > (except that I'm against doing it in HTML WG). > WebApps is reasonably good place (if there won't be any IP issues.) Starting the work in a Community Group is another option to consider. A really good option, actually. It's certainly the quickest way to get it started and to get a W3C draft actually published, and the route that would entail the least amount of unnecessary process overhead. The work could later be graduated to, e.g., the WebApps WG if/when needed. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/+
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 08:50:40 UTC