public-sdw-wg@w3.org from February 2017 by author

andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu

• SDW @ RDA P9? (Thursday, 23 February)
• RE: Metadata: bounding boxes (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: Metadata: bounding boxes (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: ACTION-249: Further work on BP8 (geometry) (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: SDW Best Practice sub-group call; Wed 15 Feb 2017 @ 16:00UTC (Tuesday, 14 February)
• RE: W3C RDF Data Cube dimensions definition (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: Delft attendance - pls fill in the wiki (Monday, 6 February)

Armin Haller

• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Monday, 27 February)
• Agenda for extended SSN meeting this week - 28-02-17 20:00 - 23:00 UTC (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Thursday, 23 February)
• SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Forecasts and observations - was I RE: SSN Thread for github issue 378 - Side effects of ssn:Observation being a kind of dul:Event instead of dul:Situation (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: ssn and github (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Agenda SSN meeting this week - 21-02-17 21:00 UTC (Monday, 20 February)
• Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy (Monday, 20 February)
• SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: Extended (3 hour) SSN subgroup meeting (Thursday, 16 February)
• Extended (3 hour) SSN subgroup meeting (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-02-17 21:00 UTC (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: ISSUE-139, ISSUE-146, Methodology ? Was: alignment sosa to ssn (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: alignment sosa to ssn (Sunday, 12 February)
• Procedure vs Process in SOSA & ISSUE-89 (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: issue-87: wiki page Property_and_Observable_Property to compare the proposals (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: New proposal for SOSA (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Monday, 6 February)
• Agenda SSN meeting this week (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action: NEW FORWARD PLAN PROPOSED (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: State of SSN: comment on namespaces and urls (Wednesday, 1 February)

Bill Roberts

• I can't make coverage sub-group call tomorrow (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SDW Next Plenary Meeting (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Coverage subgroup call this week (Tuesday, 14 February)

Byron Cochrane

• RE: Next SDW Plenary Call (Tuesday, 7 February)

Claus Stadler

• Re: Regrets for BP call today (Wednesday, 8 February)

Clemens Portele

• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Metadata: bounding boxes (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: 16 Feb iteration of BP doc published (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: 16 Feb iteration of BP doc published (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Lars's comments on the BP document (was: BP document is FROZEN pending vote to release next WD) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: [SDWWG] Next SDW Plenary Call (Wednesday, 8 February)

Dan Brickley

• Re: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes (Wednesday, 8 February)

Dmitry Brizhinev

• Re: Coverage subgroup call this week (Tuesday, 14 February)

Ed Parsons

• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values (Monday, 27 February)
• Fwd: [TC-Announce] Delft TC -- INSPIRE - What if...? -- Workshop & call for position papers (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Asking the library community for input on the BP (Tuesday, 21 February)
• SDW Next Plenary Meeting (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: SDW Best Practice sub-group call; Wed 15 Feb 2017 @ 16:00UTC (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Next SDW Plenary Call (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice (Monday, 6 February)

Francois Daoust

• [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 (Friday, 24 February)
• [Minutes SSN] Call 2017-02-21 (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Document not loaded to right fragment (was: ssn -- and use case work to be done request for help) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• OWL-Time: new Working Draft published yesterday (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file (Thursday, 2 February)
• [minutes] SDW BP call - 2017-02-01 (Thursday, 2 February)
• [minutes] SDW SSN call - 2017-01-31 (Thursday, 2 February)
• OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: State of SSN: comment on namespaces and urls (Wednesday, 1 February)

Ghislain Atemezing

• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file (Wednesday, 1 February)

Ghislain Atemezing-Pro

• Re: [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)

Jeremy Tandy

• Re: BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc (Tuesday, 28 February)
• BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Lars's comments on the BP document (was: BP document is FROZEN pending vote to release next WD) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Monday, 27 February)
• WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Monday, 27 February)
• WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Asking the library community for input on the BP (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: SDW Best Practice sub-group call; Wed 15 Feb 2017 @ 16:00UTC (Tuesday, 14 February)
• SDW Best Practice sub-group call; Wed 15 Feb 2017 @ 16:00UTC (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice (Monday, 6 February)
• BP document is FROZEN pending vote to release next WD (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice (Saturday, 4 February)
• Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice (Friday, 3 February)

Jon Blower

• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: W3C RDF Data Cube dimensions definition (Friday, 3 February)

Joshua Lieberman

• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: BP & SSN: feature of interest vs spatial thing (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: SDW @ RDA P9? (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Metadata: bounding boxes (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Metadata: bounding boxes (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Metadata: bounding boxes (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Metadata: bounding boxes (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Metadata: bounding boxes (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: actuable (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: State of SSN: comment on namespaces and urls (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: State of SSN and josh's thoughts re modules and namespaces (Wednesday, 1 February)

Kerry Taylor

• RE: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Tuesday, 28 February)
• BP & SSN: feature of interest vs spatial thing (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: Forecasts and observations - was I RE: SSN Thread for github issue 378 - Side effects of ssn:Observation being a kind of dul:Event instead of dul:Situation (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: ssn and github (Monday, 20 February)
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL (Sunday, 19 February)
• ssn and github (Sunday, 19 February)
• RE: Nine new questions for Actuation and Actuators. Was: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Thursday, 16 February)
• RE: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Thursday, 16 February)
• RE: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• RE: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• RE: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 (Tuesday, 14 February)
• RE: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• RE: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 (Monday, 13 February)
• actuable (Monday, 13 February)
• ssn Proposal for Platform (Monday, 13 February)
• alignment sosa to ssn (Saturday, 11 February)
• RE: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: ssn: issue-72 inverse properties in sosa-core (Thursday, 9 February)
• request for ssn agenda item please (Tuesday, 7 February)
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL (Tuesday, 7 February)
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL (Tuesday, 7 February)
• RE: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Tuesday, 7 February)
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL (Tuesday, 7 February)
• RE: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment (Tuesday, 7 February)
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Sunday, 5 February)
• ssn -- and use case work to be done request for help (Sunday, 5 February)
• RE: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Sunday, 5 February)
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Sunday, 5 February)
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Sunday, 5 February)
• RE: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Sunday, 5 February)
• RE: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Sunday, 5 February)
• RE: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Sunday, 5 February)
• issue-145 ssn time (Saturday, 4 February)
• tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Saturday, 4 February)
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Friday, 3 February)
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action: NEW FORWARD PLAN PROPOSED (Friday, 3 February)
• Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: units of measure - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: State of SSN: comment on namespaces and urls (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: State of SSN and josh's thoughts re modules and namespaces (Wednesday, 1 February)
• RE: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration (Wednesday, 1 February)
• RE: State of SSN: comment on namespaces and urls (Wednesday, 1 February)
• RE: State of SSN and josh's thoughts re modules and namespaces (Wednesday, 1 February)
• RE: State of SSN: comment on namespaces and urls (Wednesday, 1 February)

Krzysztof Janowicz

• Re: [w3c/sdw] Update sosa.ttl (#584) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: BP & SSN: feature of interest vs spatial thing (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Clear illustration of how much confusion the use of two namespaces brings to the users. Was: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Updated the wiki according to the minutes, and implementation of ACTION-269: name of the link between Actuator and ActuatableProperty (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: ssn and github (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: ssn and github (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: Nine new questions for Actuation and Actuators. Was: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Nine new questions for Actuation and Actuators. Was: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-02-17 21:00 UTC (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Monday, 13 February)
• Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: alignment sosa to ssn (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: Procedure vs Process in SOSA & ISSUE-89 (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: ssn: issue-72 inverse properties in sosa-core (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: [w3c/sdw] changed any mention of owl:inverseOf into schema:inverseOf (#546) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: request for ssn agenda item please (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: [w3c/sdw] Prefix declaration issues in ssnx (#537) (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: New proposal for SOSA (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Sunday, 5 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Sunday, 5 February)
• Re: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Sunday, 5 February)
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Sunday, 5 February)
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Saturday, 4 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration (Wednesday, 1 February)

Laurent Lefort

• Add RAMI to list of SSN implementations (Industrie 4.0) (was: RE: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN) (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration (let's have a better idea of what's at risk or not). (Wednesday, 1 February)

Le Phuoc, Danh

• hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Monday, 6 February)

lewis john mcgibbney

• [RELEASE] Apache Any23 2.0 (Monday, 27 February)

Linda van den Brink

• Re: 16 Feb iteration of BP doc published (Thursday, 16 February)
• Fixed respec link (Wednesday, 8 February)
• RE: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice (Friday, 3 February)
• RE: W3C RDF Data Cube dimensions definition (Friday, 3 February)
• [BP] Progress of the Best Practice (Friday, 3 February)

Little, Chris

• RE: SDW @ RDA P9? (Thursday, 23 February)
• W3C RDF Data Cube dimensions definition (Thursday, 2 February)

Matthew Perry

• Re: Regrets for BP call today (Wednesday, 8 February)

Maxime Lefrançois

• Re: [w3c/sdw] Update sosa.ttl (#584) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Monday, 27 February)
• ACTION-269 - associated pull request (Sunday, 26 February)
• Structuring the discussion term by term in the Wiki (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Thursday, 23 February)
• Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty (Thursday, 23 February)
• Question on resolution 4 in the minutes of 21/02, Was: Updated the wiki according to the minutes, and implementation of ACTION-269: name of the link between Actuator and ActuatableProperty (Thursday, 23 February)
• Question on Resolution 3 in the minutes of 21/02, Was: Updated the wiki according to the minutes, and implementation of ACTION-269: name of the link between Actuator and ActuatableProperty (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Updated the wiki according to the minutes, and implementation of ACTION-269: name of the link between Actuator and ActuatableProperty (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Clear illustration of how much confusion the use of two namespaces brings to the users. Was: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Updated the wiki according to the minutes, and implementation of ACTION-269: name of the link between Actuator and ActuatableProperty (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Forecasts and observations - was I RE: SSN Thread for github issue 378 - Side effects of ssn:Observation being a kind of dul:Event instead of dul:Situation (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: ssn and github (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: ssn and github (Monday, 20 February)
• Wiki pages to discuss ontology metadata for ssnx, sosa, and ssn (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: ISSUE-147, sub-issue Was: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Monday, 20 February)
• Nine new questions for Actuation and Actuators. Was: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Some fun with OWL DL: Instances of oldssn:Property only become instances of sosa:ObservableProperty when they are the oldssn:observedProperty of an oldssn:Observation (Monday, 13 February)
• Are MeasurementProperties and OperatingProperties observable ? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-02-17 21:00 UTC (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: ssn Proposal for Platform (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: actuable (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: issue-87: wiki page Property_and_Observable_Property to compare the proposals (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: ISSUE-139, ISSUE-146, Methodology ? Was: alignment sosa to ssn (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Monday, 13 February)
• ISSUE-139, ISSUE-146, Methodology ? Was: alignment sosa to ssn (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: Procedure vs Process in SOSA & ISSUE-89 (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: units of measure - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations (Friday, 10 February)
• issue-87: wiki page Property_and_Observable_Property to compare the proposals (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: ssn: issue-72 inverse properties in sosa-core (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: [w3c/sdw] changed any mention of owl:inverseOf into schema:inverseOf (#546) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: [w3c/sdw] changed any mention of owl:inverseOf into schema:inverseOf (#546) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• ISSUE-80 Was: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: ssn: issue-72 inverse properties in sosa-core (Wednesday, 8 February)
• ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: ssn: issue-72 inverse properties in sosa-core (Wednesday, 8 February)
• ISSUE-148, Was: Integration of FeatureOfInterest, Property, isPropertyOf, hasProperty, ... and ObservableProperty (Wednesday, 8 February)
• ISSUE-148-8 domain-range, Was: Integration of FeatureOfInterest, Property, isPropertyOf, hasProperty, ... and ObservableProperty (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Wednesday, 8 February)
• ISSUE-147, sub-issue Was: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Wednesday, 8 February)
• ISSUE-146 Was: Starting the integration process slowly on github (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Integration of FeatureOfInterest, Property, isPropertyOf, hasProperty, ... and ObservableProperty (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Starting the integration process slowly on github (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: New proposal for SOSA (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: New proposal for SOSA (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• New proposal for SOSA (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Sunday, 5 February)
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Sunday, 5 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Sunday, 5 February)
• A few issues and questions about SOSA, and a very nice picture ! (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: units of measure - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file (Thursday, 2 February)
• State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Thursday, 2 February)

Phil Archer

• [Minutes SSN] 2017 02 28 (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Fwd: Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: 16 Feb iteration of BP doc published (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: 16 Feb iteration of BP doc published (Thursday, 16 February)
• 16 Feb iteration of BP doc published (Thursday, 16 February)
• [Minutes BP] 2017 02 15 (Wednesday, 15 February)
• [Minutes SSN] 2017 02 14 (Wednesday, 15 February)
• [Minutes] 2017 02 18 (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• [Minutes SSN] 2017 02 08 (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice (Monday, 6 February)
• Delft attendance - pls fill in the wiki (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Friday, 3 February)
• Fwd: Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)

Raphaël Troncy

• Re: [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Next SDW Plenary Call (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Thursday, 2 February)

Raúl García Castro

• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Nine new questions for Actuation and Actuators. Was: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: actuable (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: ISSUE-147, sub-issue Was: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Thursday, 2 February)

Rob Atkinson

• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: I can't make coverage sub-group call tomorrow (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: BP & SSN: feature of interest vs spatial thing (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Metadata: bounding boxes (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Metadata: bounding boxes (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Metadata: bounding boxes (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Nine new questions for Actuation and Actuators. Was: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: ssn: issue-72 inverse properties in sosa-core (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: issue-87: wiki page Property_and_Observable_Property to compare the proposals (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: ISSUE-142: January-December - classes or individuals (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: request for ssn agenda item please (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: W3C RDF Data Cube dimensions definition (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Sunday, 5 February)
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: units of measure - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: State of SSN: comment on namespaces and urls (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration (Wednesday, 1 February)

Rob H Warren

• Re: [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file (Thursday, 2 February)

Scott Simmons

• Re: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 21-02-17 21:00 UTC (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: SDW Best Practice sub-group call; Wed 15 Feb 2017 @ 16:00UTC (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Coverage subgroup call this week (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-02-17 21:00 UTC (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: BP subgroup call: february 1 16:00 UTC (Wednesday, 1 February)

Simon.Cox@csiro.au

• RE: [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 (Tuesday, 28 February)
• RE: [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 (Tuesday, 28 February)
• RE: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Sunday, 26 February)
• ISSUE-144 - OWL-Time - missing interval relations (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: ISSUE-66 RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 9 (Sunday, 26 February)
• OWL-Time - ISSUE-143 - need more guidance from Kerry (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: Please review OWL-Time document (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: BP & SSN: feature of interest vs spatial thing (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: OWL-Time - Individual months, standard temporal durations (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: OWL-Time ISSUE-127 TimeZone model (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty (Saturday, 25 February)
• RE: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty (Saturday, 25 February)
• RE: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Thursday, 23 February)
• RE: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: Metadata: bounding boxes (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy (Monday, 20 February)
• Responses to missed comments (Monday, 20 February)
• RE: OWL-Time - Individual months, standard temporal durations (Monday, 20 February)
• RE: OWL-Time ISSUE-127 TimeZone model (Monday, 20 February)
• RE: Please review OWL-Time document (Monday, 20 February)
• FW: ISSUE-125: Update datatypes in OWL Time (Monday, 20 February)
• RE: ssn and github (Monday, 20 February)
• Sampling model (Wednesday, 15 February)
• RE: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• RE: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• RE: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: issue-87: wiki page Property_and_Observable_Property to compare the proposals (Sunday, 12 February)
• OWL-Time - Individual months, standard temporal durations (Sunday, 12 February)
• RE: OWL-Time - superclasses for Position and Duration (Sunday, 12 February)
• RE: issue-87: wiki page Property_and_Observable_Property to compare the proposals (Sunday, 12 February)
• RE: ISSUE-139, ISSUE-146, Methodology ? Was: alignment sosa to ssn (Sunday, 12 February)
• FW: alignment sosa to ssn (Sunday, 12 February)
• RE: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: issue-87: wiki page Property_and_Observable_Property to compare the proposals (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: ssn: issue-72 inverse properties in sosa-core (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Thursday, 9 February)
• ISSUE-142: January-December - classes or individuals (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: OWL-Time - superclasses for Position and Duration (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) (Thursday, 9 February)
• hasResult / Sampling in SOSA (Wednesday, 8 February)
• RE: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes (Wednesday, 8 February)
• RE: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment (Tuesday, 7 February)
• RE: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment (Tuesday, 7 February)
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL (Tuesday, 7 February)
• RE: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment (Tuesday, 7 February)
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Tuesday, 7 February)
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: issue-145 ssn time (Monday, 6 February)
• No need to import SKOS - was RE: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? (Sunday, 5 February)
• RE: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: units of measure - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: OWL-Time - ISSUE-65: General purpose temporal predicates (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: OWL-Time - ISSUE-65: General purpose temporal predicates (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file (Wednesday, 1 February)
• RE: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file (Wednesday, 1 February)
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) (Wednesday, 1 February)

Svensson, Lars

• Asking the library community for input on the BP (Monday, 20 February)
• RE: Please review OWL-Time document (Monday, 20 February)
• RE: Lars's comments on the BP document (was: BP document is FROZEN pending vote to release next WD) (Thursday, 9 February)
• Lars's comments on the BP document (was: BP document is FROZEN pending vote to release next WD) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• RE: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: BP subgroup call: february 1 16:00 UTC (Wednesday, 1 February)

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 February 2017 23:46:52 UTC