W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > February 2017

RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action

From: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 14:08:45 +0000
To: Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es>, Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>, "SDW WG Public List" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <SYXPR01MB15363076016E62420D4C4645A44C0@SYXPR01MB1536.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Hey -- I deserve some credit for a worked example too! (although it only revolves around the platform class, not everything).
https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Proposals_for_rewriting_SSN#Compromise_Proposal_6_made_by_Kerry_January_2017


-----Original Message-----
From: Raúl García Castro [mailto:rgarcia@fi.upm.es] 
Sent: Friday, 3 February 2017 12:45 AM
To: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>; Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>; SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action

El 2/2/17 a las 13:32, Raphaël Troncy escribió:
>> PROPOSAL: use a single name (SSN), prefix and namespace (@Prefix ssn:
>> <http://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/>, with a slash at the end), set of terms, 
>> but
>> 2+ documents, corresponding to 2+ profiles:
>>  - a "light" (the vocabulary, code name SOSA),
>>  - a "full" (imports the "light", adds some terms and semantics, as 
>> backward compatible with the old SSN as possible, putting aside the 
>> axioms involving DUL),
>>  - a "full + DUL alignment", completely compatible with the old SSN.
>
>> If my proposal gets some support, I propose my help here:
>> ACTION: Maxime to branch the current HEAD branch, implement his 
>> proposal, and issue a pull request for further discussion.
>
> +1 for the rough proposal (my only doubt is how much the full+ DUL
> alignment profile will be developed) and +1 for you proposed ACTION !
> Like Kerry (and I think Raul), I'm also pledging for a concrete 
> proposal to evaluate, where beyond general intent, we work on an 
> ontological term basis, i.e., each concept and property has its 
> complete definition machine encoded in SOSA, SSN, etc since the devil 
> is in the details. I think that the recent work from Simon, Phil and 
> Rob go in the right direction for this.
> Best regards.
>
>   Raphaël
>

Dear all,

I am also happy with this proposal (and with the action) and with the approach of start working with concrete examples to achieve progress.

Kind regards,

-- 

Dr. Raúl García Castro
http://www.garcia-castro.com/


Ontology Engineering Group
Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Informáticos Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Campus de Montegancedo, s/n - Boadilla del Monte - 28660 Madrid
Phone: +34 91 336 65 96 - Fax: +34 91 352 48 19

Received on Thursday, 2 February 2017 14:09:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 2 February 2017 14:09:27 UTC