- From: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>
- Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:00:35 +0000
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALsPASVG-6qB1Z05ANSf4BsprPYh09X_QzD=qJswd7hS8jU0UQ@mail.gmail.com>
This proposal is implemented in branch: https://github.com/w3c/sdw/tree/maxime-sosa-schemaorg and a pull request has been proposed: https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/545 Kind regards, Maxime Le mer. 8 févr. 2017 à 13:53, Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr> a écrit : > Dear all, > > about these pseudo, non Linked-Data compliant properties domainIncludes > and rangeIncludes > > sosa.ttl uses > > @prefix meta: <http://meta.schema.org/> . > > and then: > > sosa:hasSample meta:rangeIncludes sosa:Sample . > > Yet, > - meta is not a registered prefix for http://meta.schema.org/ at > prefix.cc > - the actual canonical URL for rangeIncludes is > http://schema.org/domainIncludes, as stated at its URL: extension terms > can be used in schema.org markup in the normal manner; it is not > necessary for markup publishers to indicate which extension a term is > currently in. Terms may move between extensions over time (e.g. from > pending <http://pending.schema.org/> to the core) without the need for > the corresponding markup to change. > - the registered prefix for http://schema.org/ is schema: at prefix.cc > > So I suggest: > - we use prefix: @prefix schema: <http://schema.org/> . > - we change any mention of meta:domainIncludes into schema:domainIncludes > - we change any mention of meta:rangeIncludes into schema:rangeIncludes > > Best, > Maxime >
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2017 13:01:22 UTC