- From: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>
- Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 11:29:51 +0000
- To: Krzysztof Janowicz <jano@geog.ucsb.edu>, Simon Cox <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
- Cc: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALsPASXPnYbbe3it6=EJjkanzQjtgXDmdrUs8bDsf8nhN+7RvA@mail.gmail.com>
Dear all, +1 for Kerry's (a) : - (a) use skos:example and declare it an owl annotation property (and this will work for any other skos property too). Also don’t import skos. My arguments are: - SKOS is just used for documentation purposes here. So declaring skos:example, skos:definition, skos:note as annotation properties suffice in our case; - we don't need of all SKOS axioms. Importing all of them will make SOSA/SSN more complex to browse in Protégé for example; - the users of SOSA/SSN will import SOSA/SSN, but they do absolutely not need to import SKOS axioms. Kind regards, Maxime Le dim. 5 févr. 2017 à 12:08, Krzysztof Janowicz <jano@geog.ucsb.edu> a écrit : > I am certainly fine with SKOS if this is what most of us prefer. Armin, > can you put this onto our agenda for the next call? > > On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 2:25 AM, <Simon.Cox@csiro.au> wrote: > > Btw I never intended to claim that skos was ideal here, but it was > convenient to separate out the different annotations,. A simple SPARQL > update could then finalise it to the predicate/namespace of choice. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu> > *Sent:* Saturday, 4 February 2017 5:31:05 AM > *To:* Kerry Taylor; SDW WG Public List > *Subject:* Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? > > Hi Kerry, > > I think it would be great if we could discuss this in the group meeting > next week. I would like to understand our motivation a bit better as well > as some decisions that we are taking e.g., using skos:example without > importing skos. > > Have a nice weekend > Jano > > > On 02/03/2017 09:15 PM, Kerry Taylor wrote: > > I’d like to follow the approach Simon used in sosa (as we discussed in a > meeting last year, I think) to separate examples from descriptive comments > in the ontology using skos:example. > > > > Are you ok with me doing the same in ssn? I don’t plan to change the > content substantively (although I might reword an example a little if it > seems a bit too hard to follow e.g. too brief). And I’m not going to add > amore examples at this point --- just move the ones already there. > > > > I will not import skos. > > > > Btw– I think this means specgen that we are currently using for the spec > doco will no longer be able to extract the example – nor for sosa . > > -Kerry > > > > > > -- > Krzysztof Janowicz > > Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara > 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 > > Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu > Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ > Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net > > >
Received on Sunday, 5 February 2017 11:30:41 UTC