Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice

Please don't wait until after the vote to update the change log - it 
needs to be updated before publication and in not going to be contentious.

Thanks

Phil

On 06/02/2017 11:02, Jeremy Tandy wrote:
> Linda is prepping a PR with the updated change-log (for Appendix F); we'll
> merge that after the vote.
>
>
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 at 10:59 Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Excellent - That's great
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 at 10:58 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ed - timely question. Linda & I just completed our editor's catch up
>> call.
>>
>> BP document is FROZEN and ready for people to read/review (see previous
>> emails in this chain for the change-log).
>> VOTE is scheduled for WEDNESDAY during the plenary call.
>>
>> Thank you. Jeremy
>>
>> On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 at 10:53 Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> HI Both,
>>
>> Are you looking to vote this week ?
>>
>> Ed
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 at 22:40 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I've now incorporated the final planned updates for this sprint.
>>
>> BP6 and BP7 now take account of discussions at the London F2F; some of the
>> text from BP7 has now found its way to BP14 (linking) and to §12.5.2
>> (publishing data with clear semantics).
>>
>> IMHO, BP14 still needs more work; let's try to get that done in the next
>> sprint.
>>
>> But for now, I'm done. No more changes from me before the vote to release
>> another WD.
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 at 09:39 Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Regarding ISSUE 208, I managed to draw their attention to it; waiting to
>> see if they get engaged. +1 for leaving the issue open for one more WD
>> cycle.
>>
>>
>>
>> I just closed Github issues related to BP4:
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/179
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/180
>>
>>
>>
>> I reviewed Clemens’ rewrite of BP4 and found these issues could be closed.
>>
>>
>>
>> This completes my ACTION-260.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Van:* Jeremy Tandy [mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com]
>> *Verzonden:* vrijdag 3 februari 2017 10:13
>> *Aan:* Linda van den Brink; SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)
>> *Onderwerp:* Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice
>>
>>
>>
>> +1 thanks to Ed & Clemens.
>>
>> And to Linda for summarising where we are.
>>
>> I'm on track for mods to BP 7 & 14 (as discussed in London). I also made
>> some updates to BP 6 yesterday.
>>
>> Linda: regarding ISSUE 208 in BP 7, did you manage to engage folks in the
>> NL linked data community? We should probably leave the issue open for this
>> release if we're pending a check with the TAG too.
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>> On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 at 08:05, Linda van den Brink <
>> l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> In the BP subgroup call this week we discussed the progress that was made
>> during the current sprint, when we want to do a new working draft release,
>> and what remains to be done.
>>
>>
>>
>> There were only a few people on the call, so here’s a summary of the main
>> points for the benefit of everyone.
>>
>> 1: please review BP editor’s draft for next WD release (vote in next call)
>>
>> 2: please volunteer for work items for the next (and last major!) sprint
>>
>>
>>
>> In the _*current*_ sprint we have made good progress, although not
>> everything we planned to do actually got done yet.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please everyone GET READY to review the BP draft. We decided to freeze the
>> current Editor’s draft on _*Monday February 6*_ i.e. the last changes may
>> be made on the 5th. After that the draft will be frozen for next WD
>> release.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Draft will then have the following changes compared to the current WD
>> (most but not all of this is done already):
>>
>> - the BP summary was moved to the top and the BP template explanation was
>> removed.
>>
>> - BP 4 (indexable spatial data) has been expanded by Clemens
>>
>> - Section 7 Coordinate Reference Systems was edited by Ed
>>
>> - BP7 (use HTTP URIs) + BP14 (Links to related resources) will be edited
>> by Jeremy based on discussion at the December 2016 face to face meeting in
>> London
>>
>> - BP17 (crowdsourcing) was removed from the BP document, an example around
>> crowdsourcing and the importance of knowing the source of data was added to
>> BP1 (metadata).
>>
>>
>>
>> The following were planned as well and had a volunteer but were not
>> completed in time. These will automatically go in the next sprint:
>>
>> - Action 241: Further work on best practices 3 and 18 about Coordinate
>> Reference Systems (possibly merging them). (Byron)
>>
>> - Action 249: Further work on BP8 (geometry) (Andrea)
>>
>>
>>
>> The _*next*_ sprint is actually, according to our own schedule, the last
>> one where we do substantial additions / changes. It is the last sprint but
>> one, and in the last sprint we only want to do editorial changes. However
>> there is a lot still to be done. It’s really important to stress at this
>> point that we editors need the help of the working group members, because
>> anything that doesn’t get written between now and the end of March will not
>> make it into the final document!
>>
>>
>>
>> I asked this during the call, and I will ask again now: Take a look at the
>> Backlog and volunteer for one or more of the items on that list! Any items
>> that get a volunteer will move to the sprint plan for the next sprint.
>> Anything that remains stuck on the backlog is in danger of dropping out of
>> the BP entirely.
>>
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document#Backlog_-_To_do
>>
>>
>>
>> A BIG thanks to Ed and Clemens for their work during this sprint!
>>
>>
>>
>> Linda
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Ed Parsons *FRGS
>> Geospatial Technologist, Google
>>
>> Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501
>> www.edparsons.com @edparsons
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Ed Parsons *FRGS
>> Geospatial Technologist, Google
>>
>> Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501
>> www.edparsons.com @edparsons
>>
>

-- 


Phil Archer
Data Strategist, W3C
http://www.w3.org/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1

Received on Monday, 6 February 2017 12:39:16 UTC