> > *RESOLUTION: issue-72 use owl:inverseOf to declare inverse object > properties in SOSA-core"* > Thanks for the pointer ! These minutes were not copied in the mailing list, which otherwise would have helped me find the information on my own using the search engine at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/ And so, good point. Would you by any chance have considered voting for solution (C) if you were aware of the fact that schema.org has a property named schema:inverseOf ? Best, Max > > > > On 02/08/2017 09:00 AM, Maxime Lefrançois wrote: > > Hi, > > Le mer. 8 févr. 2017 à 17:46, kjano < <notifications@github.com> > notifications@github.com> a écrit : > > "owl:inverseOf is replaced by schema:inverseOf everywhere." > > This is not what we agreed on months ago. Let us not reopen each and every > decision that this group made before. @dr-shorthair > <https://github.com/dr-shorthair> @arminhaller > <https://github.com/arminhaller> > > > From what I can tell, I see no trace of any official vote in the archive, > just some book keeping ;-) > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Nov/0081.html > > and ISSUE-72 is still open. > > If anyways one of these wasn't true, the chair MAY reopen the decision as > I present additional technical information. See the W3C Process Document > http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/ > > > In the meantime, I think it's worth thinking about the coherence of SOSA > on this point: > Additionally, I really think sosa has more chances to be integrated into > schema.org if every mention of owl:inverseOf is replaced by > schema:inverseOf > > Best, > Max > > > > -- > Krzysztof Janowicz > > Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara > 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 > > Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu > Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ > Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net > >
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2017 19:14:16 UTC