Hi, Le mer. 8 févr. 2017 à 17:46, kjano <notifications@github.com> a écrit : > "owl:inverseOf is replaced by schema:inverseOf everywhere." > > This is not what we agreed on months ago. Let us not reopen each and every > decision that this group made before. @dr-shorthair > <https://github.com/dr-shorthair> @arminhaller > <https://github.com/arminhaller> > >From what I can tell, I see no trace of any official vote in the archive, just some book keeping ;-) https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Nov/0081.html and ISSUE-72 is still open. If anyways one of these wasn't true, the chair MAY reopen the decision as I present additional technical information. See the W3C Process Document http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/ In the meantime, I think it's worth thinking about the coherence of SOSA on this point: Additionally, I really think sosa has more chances to be integrated into schema.org if every mention of owl:inverseOf is replaced by schema:inverseOf Best, Max >
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2017 17:01:36 UTC