- From: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 21:12:37 +0000
- To: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, "janowicz@ucsb.edu" <janowicz@ucsb.edu>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Ghislain Atemezing <ghislain.atemezing@mondeca.com>
- Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALsPASVQxHOEnr4iP-zz5GrxygxKJdq7BBmh_cOZF7gwe+ovFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Armin, We're not at all discussing whether we should import something in sosa, just the list of "annotation properties" that could be declared in the sosa ontology. So if I do count Phil's comment as a +1, and Ghislain as a +0 that's 2-1 in favour of using voaf and vann for now. Kind regards, Maxime Le mar. 7 févr. 2017 à 21:52, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au> a écrit : > Can I just remind that we made a decision earlier to not import anything > in SOSA. That was the reason why we are supposed to drop the SKOS import. > So close to the conference call I can’t dig out the exact time we made that > decision, but I will look for it later. > > On 8/2/17, 7:49 am, "Krzysztof Janowicz" <janowicz@ucsb.edu> wrote: > > Sure, that is fine. There are many use cases and perspectives and I am > only reporting on the one I know; see also the list below of provo-o > etc. > > On 02/07/2017 12:45 PM, Phil Archer wrote: > > Ahem... > > > > https://www.w3.org/ns/dqv.ttl > > https://www.w3.org/ns/dcat.ttl > > https://www.w3.org/ns/duv.ttl > > > > All use voaf and vann because we want them to show up in LOV :-) > > > > On 07/02/2017 20:35, Ghislain Atemezing wrote: > >> Re visibility and reusing ontologies…. > >>> Le 7 févr. 2017 à 21:01, Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu> a > >>> écrit : > >>> > >>> At least not in my experience working with them. If they see that > >>> 'xyz' is used in an ontology they are going to use, then they would > >>> like to find out what xyz is and if they find out that it is an > >>> ontology that has been created years ago by a private person and > >>> that there is no support for it and no other major player is using > >>> said ontology, they will be unhappy. > >> > >> > >> I am afraid, they will certainly only use schema.org > >> <http://schema.org/> in the next years :) > >> > >> Best, > >> Ghislain > >> -------------------------------------------- > >> Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D > >> R&D Engineer SemWeb > >> @ Mondeca, Paris, France > >> Labs: http://labs.mondeca.com <http://labs.mondeca.com/> > >> Tel: +33 (0)1 4111 3034 <01%2041%2011%2030%2034> > >> Web: www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com/> > >> Twitter: @gatemezing > >> About Me: https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing > >> <https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing> > >> > > > > > -- > Krzysztof Janowicz > > Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara > 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 > > Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu > Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ > Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 21:13:24 UTC