- From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 00:29:54 +0000
- To: <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <71880135575346a292b4faf0e278ec0f@exch1-mel.nexus.csiro.au>
Sorry should have sent this to the list. ________________________________ From: Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) Sent: Saturday, 11 February 2017 10:44:59 AM To: kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au Subject: RE: alignment sosa to ssn Yep. That's what it clearly says in its documentation. I included some alignment graphs from the very earliest sosa commits to demonstrate/test the vertical (and horizontal) modularization. I think I was generally careful to note the status in the ontology documentation. ________________________________ From: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au> Sent: Saturday, 11 February 2017 6:06:02 AM To: public-sdw-wg@w3.org Subject: alignment sosa to ssn SSN subgroup, Just for the record (I feel somewhat ridiculous saying this): We, the ssn focus group have been assured on more than one occasion that we are to take no notice of 'https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/gh-pages/ssn/rdf/ssn-sosa.ttl" (nor any other of the files in https://github.com/w3c/sdw/tree/gh-pages/ssn/rdf , with the exception of sosa.ttl) and this is only a way of documenting someone's opinion and has no status more than that. Therefore , we are safe to assume the fact that it is being updated very recently does not change that status. https://github.com/w3c/sdw/commit/c52f0174ab8feca0e325cf22e487c85dfb3a096a (Sorry folks, just preparing for the expected "...but we all decided that. Because it has been there in public all this time , and so it's all done ...." type claim). ISSUE-139 -Kerry
Received on Sunday, 12 February 2017 00:30:39 UTC