W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > February 2017

FW: alignment sosa to ssn

From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 00:29:54 +0000
To: <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <71880135575346a292b4faf0e278ec0f@exch1-mel.nexus.csiro.au>
Sorry should have sent this to the list.

________________________________
From: Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton)
Sent: Saturday, 11 February 2017 10:44:59 AM
To: kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au
Subject: RE: alignment sosa to ssn

Yep. That's what it clearly says in its documentation.

I included some alignment graphs from the very earliest sosa commits to demonstrate/test the vertical (and horizontal) modularization. I think I was generally careful to note the status in the ontology documentation.

________________________________
From: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>
Sent: Saturday, 11 February 2017 6:06:02 AM
To: public-sdw-wg@w3.org
Subject: alignment sosa to ssn

SSN subgroup,
Just for the record (I feel somewhat ridiculous saying this):

We, the ssn focus group have been assured on more than one occasion that we are to take no notice of 'https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/gh-pages/ssn/rdf/ssn-sosa.ttl"  (nor any other of the files in  https://github.com/w3c/sdw/tree/gh-pages/ssn/rdf , with the exception of sosa.ttl) and this is only a way of documenting someone's opinion and has no status more than that.

Therefore , we are safe to assume the fact that it is being updated very recently  does not change that status. https://github.com/w3c/sdw/commit/c52f0174ab8feca0e325cf22e487c85dfb3a096a

(Sorry folks,  just  preparing for the expected  "...but we all decided that.  Because it has been there  in public all this time , and so it's all done ...."  type claim).

ISSUE-139
-Kerry
Received on Sunday, 12 February 2017 00:30:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:29 UTC