- From: Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:42:00 -0800
- To: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <12c81566-8f96-8602-f626-1e0c60accb00@ucsb.edu>
Hi Maxime, > On the other hand, shouldn't we start talking about two other renaming > that could be important here to generalize to > Observation/Actuation/SamplingActivity > > instead of madeObservation/madeBySensor , maybe something more general > could save us the redefinition of these properties for > Actuation/SamplingActivity > > For example: generated / isGeneratedBy ? I see your point here. Are you arguing for a general generated / isGeneratedBy relation for all the observation, actuation, and sampling cases? Personally, I strongly favor relations that are as specific as possible especially for SOSA (as it does not have anything formal to say about these relations). A typical anti-pattern would, for instance, be a general 'has' relations. Clearly this is all not back and white. Maybe we can come up with a consistent naming schema and I think this is exactly what Armin proposed by madeObservation, madeBySensor, and so on. I agree that we would have to keep it similar for the Sampling part as well (if there would be such a need). Cheers, Jano On 02/20/2017 11:26 AM, Maxime Lefrançois wrote: > Hi all, > > This looks good overall, > > If the associated vote for this wiki page is: > > "shall we rename oldssn:observedBy into some term that is the inverse > of oldssn:madeObservation ?" then +1 for me > > On the other hand, shouldn't we start talking about two other renaming > that could be important here to generalize to > Observation/Actuation/SamplingActivity > > instead of madeObservation/madeBySensor , maybe something more general > could save us the redefinition of these properties for > Actuation/SamplingActivity > > For example: generated / isGeneratedBy ? > > a minor comment: in ssnx, some ssn prefixes should be changed to oldssn > > Kind regards, > Maxime > > Le lun. 20 févr. 2017 à 07:02, Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu > <mailto:janowicz@ucsb.edu>> a écrit : > > Thanks Armin, these changes look good to me. > > > On 02/19/2017 08:55 PM, Armin Haller wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have created a wiki page >> (https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Naming_of_isObservedBy_vs_madeObservation_in_SOSA) >> that details a solution to Issue-108 >> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/108>https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/108 >> that us SSN editors have agreed on. >> >> Please have a look at the solution to the small naming issue that >> resulted from the introduction of inverse properties in SOSA that >> clashed with a property name in SSN (observedBy) which itself has >> not been entirely consistent with the naming pattern in old SSN. >> >> If there are no objections, these changes will be implemented in >> SOSA and SSN and issue-108 closed. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Armin >> > > > -- > Krzysztof Janowicz > > Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara > 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 > > Email:jano@geog.ucsb.edu <mailto:jano@geog.ucsb.edu> > Webpage:http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ <http://geog.ucsb.edu/%7Ejano/> > Semantic Web Journal:http://www.semantic-web-journal.net > -- Krzysztof Janowicz Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
Received on Monday, 20 February 2017 19:42:39 UTC