Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action

El 2/2/17 a las 13:32, Raphaël Troncy escribió:
>> PROPOSAL: use a single name (SSN), prefix and namespace (@Prefix ssn:
>> <http://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/>, with a slash at the end), set of terms, but
>> 2+ documents, corresponding to 2+ profiles:
>>  - a "light" (the vocabulary, code name SOSA),
>>  - a "full" (imports the "light", adds some terms and semantics, as
>> backward compatible with the old SSN as possible, putting aside the
>> axioms involving DUL),
>>  - a "full + DUL alignment", completely compatible with the old SSN.
>
>> If my proposal gets some support, I propose my help here:
>> ACTION: Maxime to branch the current HEAD branch, implement his
>> proposal, and issue a pull request for further discussion.
>
> +1 for the rough proposal (my only doubt is how much the full+ DUL
> alignment profile will be developed) and +1 for you proposed ACTION !
> Like Kerry (and I think Raul), I'm also pledging for a concrete proposal
> to evaluate, where beyond general intent, we work on an ontological term
> basis, i.e., each concept and property has its complete definition
> machine encoded in SOSA, SSN, etc since the devil is in the details. I
> think that the recent work from Simon, Phil and Rob go in the right
> direction for this.
> Best regards.
>
>   Raphaël
>

Dear all,

I am also happy with this proposal (and with the action) and with the 
approach of start working with concrete examples to achieve progress.

Kind regards,

-- 

Dr. Raúl García Castro
http://www.garcia-castro.com/

Ontology Engineering Group
Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Informáticos
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Campus de Montegancedo, s/n - Boadilla del Monte - 28660 Madrid
Phone: +34 91 336 65 96 - Fax: +34 91 352 48 19

Received on Thursday, 2 February 2017 13:45:29 UTC