- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 18:12:25 +0100
- To: "Le Phuoc, Danh" <danh.lephuoc@tu-berlin.de>, Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>, "Simon.Cox@csiro.au" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, "kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au" <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, "armin.haller@anu.edu.au" <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, "maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr" <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>, "jano@geog.ucsb.edu" <jano@geog.ucsb.edu>
- Cc: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> I voted +1 for using SKOS:example based on its usability of this > property due the fact it’s been there for a while and some data > annotation tools/ontology editors might support some features with it. +1 for exactly the same reasons. -1 for minting a similar property in the ssn namespace since I don't see any good reason for doing so. Re-using a skos property (which is declared as an owl:AnnotationProperty anyway) does not mean the whole skos vocab should be imported. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech Data Science Department 450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Monday, 6 February 2017 17:12:56 UTC