Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ?

We are all on the call Maxime, why not join us?

On 02/07/2017 01:12 PM, Maxime Lefrançois wrote:
> Hi Armin,
>
> We're not at all discussing whether we should import something in 
> sosa, just the list of "annotation properties" that could be declared 
> in the sosa ontology.
>
> So if I do count Phil's comment as a +1, and Ghislain as a  +0
>
> that's 2-1 in favour of using voaf and vann for now.
>
> Kind regards,
> Maxime
>
> Le mar. 7 févr. 2017 à 21:52, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au 
> <mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au>> a écrit :
>
>     Can I just remind that we made a decision earlier to not import
>     anything in SOSA. That was the reason why we are supposed to drop
>     the SKOS import. So close to the conference call I can’t dig out
>     the exact time we made that decision, but I will look for it later.
>
>     On 8/2/17, 7:49 am, "Krzysztof Janowicz" <janowicz@ucsb.edu
>     <mailto:janowicz@ucsb.edu>> wrote:
>
>         Sure, that is fine. There are many use cases and perspectives
>     and I am
>         only reporting on the one I know; see also the list below of
>     provo-o etc.
>
>         On 02/07/2017 12:45 PM, Phil Archer wrote:
>         > Ahem...
>         >
>         > https://www.w3.org/ns/dqv.ttl
>         > https://www.w3.org/ns/dcat.ttl
>         > https://www.w3.org/ns/duv.ttl
>         >
>         > All use voaf and vann because we want them to show up in LOV :-)
>         >
>         > On 07/02/2017 20:35, Ghislain Atemezing wrote:
>         >> Re visibility and reusing ontologies….
>         >>> Le 7 févr. 2017 à 21:01, Krzysztof Janowicz
>     <janowicz@ucsb.edu <mailto:janowicz@ucsb.edu>> a
>         >>> écrit :
>         >>>
>         >>> At least not in my experience working with them. If they
>     see that
>         >>> 'xyz' is used in an ontology they are going to use, then
>     they would
>         >>> like to find out what xyz is and if they find out that it
>     is an
>         >>> ontology that has been created years ago by a private
>     person and
>         >>> that there is no support for it and no other major player
>     is using
>         >>> said ontology, they will be unhappy.
>         >>
>         >>
>         >> I am afraid, they will certainly only use schema.org
>     <http://schema.org>
>         >> <http://schema.org/> in the next years :)
>         >>
>         >> Best,
>         >> Ghislain
>         >> --------------------------------------------
>         >> Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D
>         >> R&D Engineer SemWeb
>         >> @ Mondeca, Paris, France
>         >> Labs: http://labs.mondeca.com <http://labs.mondeca.com/>
>         >> Tel: +33 (0)1 4111 3034 <tel:01%2041%2011%2030%2034>
>         >> Web: www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com>
>     <http://www.mondeca.com/>
>         >> Twitter: @gatemezing
>         >> About Me: https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing
>         >> <https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing>
>         >>
>         >
>
>
>         --
>         Krzysztof Janowicz
>
>         Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
>         4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060
>
>         Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu <mailto:jano@geog.ucsb.edu>
>         Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/
>     <http://geog.ucsb.edu/%7Ejano/>
>         Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
>
>
>
>


-- 
Krzysztof Janowicz

Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060

Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu
Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/
Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net