- From: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>
- Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 05:41:43 +0000
- To: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <SYXPR01MB15363441B5E6AD6708B1BF98A44E0@SYXPR01MB1536.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Raul notes in https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Dec/0181.html * ssn:startTime and ssn:endTime >> They are not documented in the ontology with rdfs:comment (it happens in others such as observedBy). And the link that appears in the description is "broken" (http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/SSN_Base#Time). >> They are not used in any of the other entities in the ontology; should we remove them? I agree --- either that or align with QB4ST and/or owlTime. I prefer removing as I cannot find anybody using them and (can someone else confirm please)?, not even in the ssn examples. If I recall they are intended to be used as part of the deployment (the period in which a sensor was in some deployment)., but I suppose they can be used for other things to - just generally useful subclasses of dul:Region. I will populate the comment field but await a decision on removal or whatever. Btw - they should be "deprecated' in preference to deletion. Raised issue-145 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/145 -Kerry
Received on Saturday, 4 February 2017 05:42:24 UTC