- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 09:52:08 +0100
- To: <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Hello SDW BP group,
The minutes of yesterday's call are available at:
http://www.w3.org/2017/02/01-sdwbp-minutes.html
... and copied as raw text below.
Please note the proposal to freeze edits on Monday to publish an updated draft, and the call for volunteers to work on remaining actions during next sprint, until the group meets F2F. Bear in mind that this next sprint will also be the last "substantive" one. Further updates to the document after that will likely remain editorial in nature.
Thanks,
Francois.
-----
Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Teleconference
01 Feb 2017
[2]Agenda
[2] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:BP-Telecon20170201
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2017/02/01-sdwbp-irc
Attendees
Present
Linda, ClemensPortele, Francois, ScottSimmons,
AndreaPerego, ChrisLittle
Regrets
Jeremy, Lars
Chair
Linda
Scribe
ClemensPortele
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Discuss progress of current sprint based on the
Sprint Plan
2. [6]ACTION-242
3. [7]ACTION-232, ACTION-233
4. [8]ACTION-234
5. [9]ACTION-247 Rewrite of section 7 Coordinate
Reference Systems
6. [10]ACTION-241 Further work on best practices 3 and 18
about Coordinate Reference Systems (possibly merging
them)
7. [11]ACTION-248 Further work on BP7 (use HTTP URIs) +
BP14 (Links to related resources)
8. [12]ACTION-249 Further work on BP8 (geometry)
9. [13]Other actions for this sprint
10. [14]Outreach for wider review
11. [15]discuss contents of next sprint
__________________________________________________________
Approving [16]last SDW BP call minutes:
[16] https://www.w3.org/2017/01/18-sdwbp-minutes
<Linda> +1
<ClemensPortele> +1
Minutes approved.
Patent call:
-> [17]https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call
[17] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call
Discuss progress of current sprint based on the Sprint Plan
[18]https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_d
ocument
[18] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document
ACTION-242
(Restructure the document to move the summary to the top and
remove the template)
Linda: Restructuring is done, BP overview is now chapter 4
... action is complete
ACTION-232, ACTION-233
<Linda> ClemensPortele: is done, except that links to issues
are still in the draft.
ClemensPortele: actions done, no comments received
... issues could be closed
Action Linda to review whether the issues can be closed
<trackbot> Created ACTION-260 - Review whether the issues can
be closed [on Linda van den Brink - due 2017-02-08].
Linda: Everyone should review the changes (like all other
changes)
ACTION-234
ClemensPortele: schema.org snippet is included, but statistics
on schema.org Place is missing
... needs to wait for Ed's input
ACTION-247 Rewrite of section 7 Coordinate Reference Systems
Linda: Done, rewrite done by Ed and now in the Editor's draft
... some parts were left out as too detailed for the audience
ClemensPortele: detail seemed sufficient to me
Linda: again, everyone to review
ACTION-241 Further work on best practices 3 and 18 about Coordinate
Reference Systems (possibly merging them)
Linda: Byron is working on it, no pull request, progress
unclear
Action Linda to ask Byron about progress on ACTION-241
<trackbot> Created ACTION-261 - Ask byron about progress on
action-241 [on Linda van den Brink - due 2017-02-08].
ACTION-248 Further work on BP7 (use HTTP URIs) + BP14 (Links to
related resources)
Linda: jtandy reported that he wants to work on it over the
weekend
... should be part of the next release
ACTION-249 Further work on BP8 (geometry)
AndreaPerego: Had a call with jtandy about the changes
... will work on this next week, we should have something ready
in two weeks
... plans to make changes in fork in his own repository so that
everyone can review before merging into the Editor's draft
Linda: sounds good
AndreaPerego: There has been a discussion on the email list and
in the last meeting that will have an impact on the BP
... also we should add to the glossary, e.g. on "dimension"
... there is a specialist definition in the ISO-based glossary,
but we should also have something for the non-specialist
Linda: yes, this is one of the terms we take for granted
ChrisLittle: my working definition is what is in the RDF Data
Cube
... other work by Rob Atkinson as well as Peter Baumann (WCS)
... probably same meaning, but in some cases "dimension" is
reduced to coordinate dimension
... but, e.g., "species" can be a dimension, too
AndreaPerego: Please provide a link to the Data Cube definition
ChrisLittle: Will do
AndreaPerego: I will add candidates for discussion in my fork
so we can discuss it
ChrisLittle: This is raised also in the OGC as it is relevant
for map services
Linda: so this action will not be ready for the next release
AndreaPerego: probably yes, but it should be ready for the next
release
Other actions for this sprint
Linda: None working on BP1, so this will not be part of the
sprint
... ACTION-240 Remove BP17 (crowdsourcing) from BP document is
done. Some text has been moved elsewhere (BP1)
... ... in examples
... ... also ready for review
Outreach for wider review
Linda: task on Ed and Phil
... ... progress is unclear
... Recap - most issues are done and wait for review
... when should we freeze? Proposal: Monday morning (would
include actions 248, but not 249, 241 unclear)
... ... thoughts?
<AndreaPerego> +1 to ClemensPortele
ClemensPortele: I think we should stick to our time plan
<ChrisLittle> +1 to freeze
PROPOSAL: Freeze edits on Monday morning
<AndreaPerego> +1
<Linda> +1
<ClemensPortele> +1
Action Linda to update BP sprint plan accordingly
<trackbot> Created ACTION-262 - Update bp sprint plan
accordingly [on Linda van den Brink - due 2017-02-08].
discuss contents of next sprint
Linda: next week to next f2f meeting
... See backlog
[19]https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_d
ocument#Backlog_-_To_do
... highest priority comes first in the list
... BP1 was discussed in London and we need address the points
made there
... ... see [20]https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/520
... ... discussion probably needs a larger group than we have
today, but it should be in the next sprint
[19] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document#Backlog_-_To_do
[20] https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/520
<ClemensPortele> +1
<Linda> +1
<AndreaPerego> +1
<ChrisLittle> +1
<ScottSimmons> +1
Linda: Next one for the next sprint would be BP10 (spatial
semantics). A choice between vocabularies, or a good method for
selecting the right vocabulary for a specific use, is needed.
See [21]https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/39 and
[22]https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/214.
... ... should be in the next sprint, too
[21] https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/39
[22] https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/214.
<ClemensPortele> +1
<Linda> +1
<ChrisLittle> +1
<AndreaPerego> +1
Linda: One question is who wants to work on BP10 and has ideas?
AndreaPerego: This is general and affects also how we select
how we represent geometries
Linda: The work on the spatial ontology will take longer than
the BP work
AndreaPerego: Then we should show how things are done today
(examples)
... ... will make a proposal in the ongoing work on BP8
Linda: currently no owner for BP10, but we agree it is a key
issue
... Anyone willing to own BP1?
(silence)
Linda: Next is BP2 (provide context required to interpret data
values, [23]https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/384)
... ... can it be removed, covered by DWBP already?
... ... could also be in a future spint
... Also no owner at the moment
[23] https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/384)
<ChrisLittle> My ACTION: here is the link to the W3C RDF (non)
definition of Dimensions:
[24]http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/
[24] http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/
Linda: Next is chapter 11 (how to use these best practices,
[25]https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/381)
[25] https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/381)
<AndreaPerego> Thanks, ChrisLittle !
Linda: Any topic on the backlog where we have a volunteer?
tidoust: question on the time line - based on the current plan
after this spring there will mainly be editorial changes
... ... so everything where we do not have a volunteer for the
next sprint, we won't get it into the BP document
Linda: yes, this correct - please consider this
Action Linda to send email to the WG to remind everyone to
volunteer for the next sprint, otherwise it is in danger of
being dropped from the BP document
<trackbot> Created ACTION-263 - Send email to the wg to remind
everyone to volunteer for the next sprint, otherwise it is in
danger of being dropped from the bp document [on Linda van den
Brink - due 2017-02-08].
[End of minutes]
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2017 08:52:19 UTC