> From what I can tell, I see no trace of any official vote in the > archive, just some book keeping ;-) > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Nov/0081.html > > and ISSUE-72 is still open. Please see the meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2016/11/15-sdwssn-minutes "ahaller: second issue is owl class but now this is easy because we already used owl:inverseOf now *RESOLUTION: issue-72 use owl:inverseOf to declare inverse object properties in SOSA-core"* On 02/08/2017 09:00 AM, Maxime Lefrançois wrote: > Hi, > > Le mer. 8 févr. 2017 à 17:46, kjano <notifications@github.com > <mailto:notifications@github.com>> a écrit : > > "owl:inverseOf is replaced by schema:inverseOf everywhere." > > This is not what we agreed on months ago. Let us not reopen each > and every decision that this group made before. @dr-shorthair > <https://github.com/dr-shorthair> @arminhaller > <https://github.com/arminhaller> > > > From what I can tell, I see no trace of any official vote in the > archive, just some book keeping ;-) > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Nov/0081.html > and ISSUE-72 is still open. > > If anyways one of these wasn't true, the chair MAY reopen the decision > as I present additional technical information. See the W3C Process > Document http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/ > > > In the meantime, I think it's worth thinking about the coherence of > SOSA on this point: > Additionally, I really think sosa has more chances to be integrated > into schema.org <http://schema.org> if every mention of owl:inverseOf > is replaced by schema:inverseOf > > Best, > Max > -- Krzysztof Janowicz Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2017 17:24:09 UTC