Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN

Please, I would like us to wait and keep ISSUE-80 open for until the
integration process is complete,

As you may have noticed, these two proposals are very, very similar
technically.
It would be quite easy to swap from one to another.

So would I suggest we keep using two different namespaces for now, and
discuss *once the integration process is complete* the pro and cons of
these different solutions.
I don't think most of the participants get the full picture and
implications of one or the other solutions anyways, for now.

Kind regards,
Maxime

Le mer. 8 févr. 2017 à 04:44, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au> a
écrit :

> Thanks Maxime for the additions to the Wiki!
>
>
>
> I think this is now very detailed and we can proceed to vote on the last
> part of the issue embedded in ISSUE-80
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/80. Are we using one
> unifying namespace or are we using different namespaces in our next telco.
>
>
>
> *From: *Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>
> *Date: *Wednesday, 8 February 2017 at 3:52 am
> *To: *"janowicz@ucsb.edu" <janowicz@ucsb.edu>, Kerry Taylor <
> kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, "
> public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN
>
>
>
> Sure !
>
> I think we agreed on this before ...
>
>
>
> Le mar. 7 févr. 2017 à 17:45, Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu> a
> écrit :
>
> Just to make sure, in all cases we assume that there are two separate
> files and two separate URLs.
>
>
>
> On 02/07/2017 06:58 AM, Kerry Taylor wrote:
>
> Sanity-checked!
>
>
>
> *From:* Armin Haller [mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au
> <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 7 February 2017 3:09 PM
> *To:* public-sdw-wg@w3.org
> *Subject:* Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have made an attempt to showcase the implementation of using different
> or the same namespace for SOSA and SSN on a new wiki page:
>
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/NamespaceIssue
>
>
>
> Currently we have an implementation that follows the two namespace
> proposal.
>
>
>
> Can I ask, in particular, the advocates of only having one namespace for
> SOSA/SSN to sanity-check the implementation option on the Wiki. As this is
> rather unusual ontology design, I don’t know if I have captured the
> intention correctly.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Armin
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Krzysztof Janowicz
>
>
>
> Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
>
> 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060
>
>
>
> Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu
>
> Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/
>
> Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
>
>