- From: Rob H Warren <warren@muninn-project.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 12:40:32 -0500
- To: Lars Svensson <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
- Cc: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>, Ghislain Atemezing <ghislain.atemezing@mondeca.com>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
>> - this is in the set of Metadata Recommendations For Linked Open Data Vocabularies, >> promoted by the Linked Open Vocabulary website [1] . See section "Vocabulary >> Elements (Classes and Properties)" >> - This is consistent with the practice applied in most of the vocabularies published on >> the W3C website. >> - This practice will also be applied in the ontologies published by the SSN sub-group. >> There should be some consitency at least within the SDW group. > > +1 for rdfs:isDefinedBy from me, too, for the very same reasons (that I couldn't have phrased so well). > > Best, > Lars +1 here also. The term definition sometimes is re-based to another base url during processing. rdfs:isDefinedBy gives you an authoritative source for the triple. -rhw
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2017 17:42:10 UTC