Hello, > Le 1 févr. 2017 à 18:03, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> a écrit : > > 1. It has the following RDF statement: <http://www.w3.org/2006/time <http://www.w3.org/2006/time>> owl:imports <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/>> > The Ontology refers to DC terms (contributor, creator), which seems good, but why does it "import" DC elements? Good question. I am not also a fan of owl:imports. We can maybe use this idea of “soft reuse” proposed by Stian here [1]. Best, Ghislain [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2017Jan/0049.html <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2017Jan/0049.html> -------------------------------------------- Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D R&D Engineer SemWeb @ Mondeca, Paris, France Labs: http://labs.mondeca.com <http://labs.mondeca.com/> Tel: +33 (0)1 4111 3034 Web: www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com/> Twitter: @gatemezing About Me: https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing <https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing>Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2017 17:19:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:29 UTC