- From: Ghislain Atemezing <ghislain.atemezing@mondeca.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 18:14:18 +0100
- To: public-sdw-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2017 17:15:19 UTC
Hi François, Le 01/02/2017 à 18:03, Francois Daoust a écrit : > 2. There are no "rdfs:isDefinedBy" statements. More specifically, I was expecting to see "rdfs:isDefinedBy<http://www.w3.org/2006/time>" for each class and property in the ontology. Aren't they needed (or recommended) to link back classes and properties back to the ontology? +0. There is no recommendation of using rdfs:isDefinedBy for each class and property. IMHO, knowing that all the ontologies used in the vocab are dereferenceable par their URIs, I would not see any need to add that extra triples. Best, Ghislain -- -------------------------------------------- Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D R&D Engineer @ Mondeca, Paris, France Labs: http://labs.mondeca.com Tel: +33 (0)1 4111 3034 Web: www.mondeca.com Twitter: @gatemezing About Me: http://atemezing.org http://linkedvocabs.org/perso/img/happyNewYearMondeca.jpg
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2017 17:15:19 UTC