W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > February 2017

BP & SSN: feature of interest vs spatial thing

From: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 05:36:09 +0000
To: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <SYXPR01MB153655D0288BAA5B262CF3F0A4540@SYXPR01MB1536.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
SDWers,
I note that BP has moved away from the O&M concept of "feature" towards "spatial thing" instead - yet in SSN we are using  O&M's  "Feature of Interest " with the following 2 descriptions:

(1) sosa:FeatureOfInterest:  "The thing whose property is being estimated or calculated in the course of an Observation to arrive at a Result or whose property is being manipulated by an Actuator"
AND

(2) Ssn:FeatureOfInterest: "A feature is an abstraction of real world phenomena (thing, person,  event, etc)".

Formally, ssn traditionally defined it simply as an Event or Object.

What do those in the BP space think about this? In ssn I don't think we even care whether the thing being observed  has a geometry, but indeed "Feature" used in the context of ssn inherits all the same problems that the BP documents. Should we use "Spatial thing" as a way of lining up with BP?

A short extract from current BP draft follows:

To avoid confusion, we adopt the term "spatial thing<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#dfn-spatial-thing>" throughout the remainder of this best practice document. "Spatial thing<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#dfn-spatial-thing>" is defined in [W3C-BASIC-GEO<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#bib-W3C-BASIC-GEO>] as "Anything with spatial extent, i.e. size, shape, or position. e.g. people, places, bowling balls, as well as abstract areas like cubes".

The concept of "spatial thing<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#dfn-spatial-thing>" is considered to include both "real-world phenomena" and their abstractions (e.g. "feature<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#dfn-feature>" as defined in [ISO-19101<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#bib-ISO-19101>]). Furthermore, we treat it as inclusive of other commonly used definitions; e.g. Feature from [NeoGeo<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#bib-NeoGeo>], described as "A geographical feature, capable of holding spatial relations"........
Looking more closely, it is important to note that geometry is typically a property of a spatial thing<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#dfn-spatial-thing>.

-Kerry
Received on Sunday, 26 February 2017 05:36:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:30 UTC