Re: ssn and github

Agreed. These are small changes (just some metadata), so we will have to
work on them anyways some day.
I'll do what you suggest for bigger modifications.
Kind regards,
Maxime

Le lun. 20 févr. 2017 20:26, Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu> a
écrit :

> Hi Maxime,
>
>
> I guess you are referring to the pull requests I created today.
>
>
> Not only but also :-).
>
>
>  - Each of these PR mention: "Before merging this pull request, please
> discuss options in the Wiki <some link to the wiki>"
>
>
> Yes, but then we should create the changes in the code and issue a pull
> request after the discussion and not before, right?
>
>
>  - I purposely  created one PR = one wiki page, hence we can discuss,
> vote, modify the related PR branch accordingly, and merge only the changes
> that have been voted for.
>
>
> I see. This is why I said that I will ignore those requests for now. I
> agree that it makes sense to issue small pull requests and do minor updates
> so that we have something to show during our telcos (in fact, I did so one
> time as well),  but for larger and more substantial changes, I would
> propose to go step-by-step.
>
> Cheers,
> Krzysztof
>
>
>
> On 02/20/2017 11:09 AM, Maxime Lefrançois wrote:
>
> Hi Krysztof, all,
>
> Krysztof, you wrote:
> > Yes, but there are many, many new pull requests for features that have
> not yet
> > been discussed in the group, so I will only look at and accept those
> that reflect
> > consensus within the group.
>
> I guess you are referring to the pull requests I created today.
>
>  - Each of these PR mention: "Before merging this pull request, please
> discuss options in the Wiki <some link to the wiki>"
>
>  - I purposely  created one PR = one wiki page, hence we can discuss,
> vote, modify the related PR branch accordingly, and merge only the changes
> that have been voted for.
>
>  - the base branch for each of these PR is "maxime-methodology", which is
> still not merged with "gh-pages" (see https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/554).
> Merging any of these should then be safe anyways.
>
> Kind regards,
> Maxime
>
>
>
> Best,
> Jano
>
>
>
>
> On 02/19/2017 10:33 PM, Kerry Taylor wrote:
>
> Ok, thks. My PR yesterday  does the ssn.ttl /ssn.owl part  of the fix
> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/560 – I will do the rest when I get a
> chance.
>
>
>
> Krysztof, can you please review and merge?
>
>
>
> -Kerry
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Simon.Cox@csiro.au [mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
> <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>]
> *Sent:* Monday, 20 February 2017 12:15 PM
> *To:* Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au> <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>
> <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>; janowicz@ucsb.edu; danh.lephuoc@tu-berlin.de;
> Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au> <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>
> *Cc:* public-sdw-wg@w3.org
> *Subject:* RE: ssn and github
>
>
>
> Hi Kerry –
>
>
>
> We had some issues integrating a pull-request relating to O&M alignment.
> It was originally issued before the re-name, and we were trying to retain
> the commit history on the branch I had been working on. The ttl had gotten
> re-ordered along the way due to me having opened it in TopBraid. We tried
> to reverse that, but clearly failed.
>
>
> Would be very helpful if you could reset the ssn artefacts.
>
>
>
> Simon
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Kerry Taylor [mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au
> <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>]
> *Sent:* Sunday, 19 February, 2017 15:02
> *To:* janowicz@ucsb.edu; danh.lephuoc@tu-berlin.de; Armin Haller <
> armin.haller@anu.edu.au>
> *Cc:* public-sdw-wg@w3.org
> *Subject:* ssn and github
>
>
>
> Github appears to have yet another error on it around ssn:
>
>
>
> I can see that there is a new file created here
> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/commit/da109c5b1a8758582caf18c8c797887387123aee#diff-95f609f3731bdeb74f41d82be5f0fadc
> called ssn.owl.
>
>
>
> 1) didn’t every one want “ssn.ttl” to be  used instead of “ssn.owl”  (.owl
> suffix)? Or  have  I misunderstood?
>
>
>
> 2)  It is out of date--- it appears to be an old copy that does not
> capture changes to ssn.ttl  in the past few weeks and is inconsistent with
> ssn.ttl
>
>
>
> 3) I strongly suggest we keep only one of them on git – either ssn.owl or
> ssn.ttl but not  both for fear of getting out of sync (as they are right
> now)
>
>
>
>
>
> I will remove ssn.owl in my next PR – I hope that is ok. Please let me
> know ASAP if that should not be done.
>
>
>
> There is also something  not right going on with dul-alignment.owl – but I
> am going to leave that alone for the principle of “first, do no harm.”
>
>
>
> --Kerry
>
>
>
>
>
> Dr Kerry Taylor
>
> Associate Professor (Data Science)
>
> Research School of Computer Science
>
> ANU College of Engineering and Computer Science
>
> Canberra ACT 2601 Australia
>
> +61 2 6125 8560
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Krzysztof Janowicz
>
> Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
> 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060
>
> Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu
> Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/
> Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
>
>
>
> --
> Krzysztof Janowicz
>
> Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
> 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060
>
> Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu
> Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/
> Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
>
>