W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > February 2017

Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture

From: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:09:35 +0000
Message-ID: <CALsPASX4aA9g43n1toRCJf8566bUijW=s3FGYwXG-51Vx13-1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Dear all,

I updated option 1, and highlighted its multiple variants,

I would like to highlight variant sosa1, for which looking up the unified
namespace leads to the SOSA ontology.

Kind regards,
Maxime


Le jeu. 23 févr. 2017 à 12:12, Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr> a
écrit :

> > ➢ Done, changed it on the Wiki. I think that makes it clearer.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > ➢ You can use the ontology URI to figure out which terms are in the core
> (SOSA). It is the same behaviour as in Option 1. In Option 1 you also
> either need to dereference each term to figure out where it is defined or
> to use the ontology URI of SOSA or SSN explicitly. If you think this is an
> important caveat, you can spell that out in the implication for both
> options.
>
> I agree, this is true for both options 1 and 2. Done, I have added for
> each: "* One needs to dereference a term to figure out where this term
> is defined OR to use the ontology URI of SOSA or SSN explicitly since
> there is just ONE unify namespace."
>
> Note: Option 3b is still Option 3b and not a variant of Option 1
> although it could be.
>
>    Raphaël
>
> --
> Raphaël Troncy
> EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech
> Data Science Department
> 450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
> e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 <04%2093%2000%2082%2042>
> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 <04%2090%2000%2082%2000>
> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
>
>
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2017 19:10:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:30 UTC