W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > February 2017

ISSUE-148, Was: Integration of FeatureOfInterest, Property, isPropertyOf, hasProperty, ... and ObservableProperty

From: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 10:53:21 +0000
Message-ID: <CALsPASXiPBMJPz2g0QHFQo3voSWx8Jgzn4DvxbVLMdDv88tiwQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
This thread is related to ISSUE-148


ISSUE-148 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/148>-1:

in ssnx.ttl:

oldssn:Property owl:equivalentClass sosa:ObservableProperty ;

and in ssn.ttl

sosa:ObservableProperty rdfs:subClassOf ssn:Property .


 # TODO: check these axioms together do solve ISSUE-87
<https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/87> ?


ISSUE-148 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/148>-2:
in sosa.ttl:

sosa:FeatureOfInterest skos:definition """The thing whose property is being
estimated or calculated in the course of an observation to arrive at a
Result."""@en ;

# TODO: check. Too restrictive for FeatureOfInterest that only have
properties that can be actuated ?




ISSUE-148 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/148>-3:
in sosa.ttl:


sosa:hasProperty skos:definition """Relation between a FeatureOfInterest
and an ObservableProperty of that feature."""@en ;

# TODO: check ObservableProperty in the definition. Too restrictive ?


ISSUE-148 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/148>-4:
in sosa.ttl:


sosa:isPropertyOf skos:definition """Relation between an ObservableProperty
(a Quality observable by a sensor) and the FeatureOfInterest it belongs
to."""@en ;

# TODO: check ObservableProperty in the definition. Too restrictive ?


ISSUE-148 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/148>-5:
in ssn.ttl:

sosa:FeatureOfInterest
rdfs:comment """A feature of interest is linked to some instance and only
instances of sosa:ObservableProperty by property sosa:hasProperty"""@en ;
rdfs:subClassOf [ owl:onProperty sosa:hasProperty ; owl:someValuesFrom
sosa:ObservableProperty ] ,
rdfs:subClassOf [ owl:onProperty sosa:hasProperty ; owl:allValuesFrom
sosa:ObservableProperty ] . # TODO: check. should it be the new
ssn:Property ?


ISSUE-148 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/148>-6:
in ssn.ttl:

ssn:Property skos:definition """A Quality of an Event or Object that is
observable, actuable, or ... That is, not a Quality of an abstract entity,
but rather an aspect of an entity that is intrinsic to and cannot exist
without the entity."""@en ; # TODO: check, this is a proposal.


ISSUE-148 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/148>-7:
in ssn.ttl:

sosa:isPropertyOf a owl:FunctionalProperty ; # TODO: check, this is a
proposal.


ISSUE-148 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/148>-8:
in ssn.ttl:

sosa:isPropertyOf rdfs:domain sosa:ObservableProperty ; # TODO: check, this
is a proposal.
sosa:isPropertyOf rdfs:range sosa:FeatureOfInterest . # TODO: check, this
is a proposal.

This sub-issue ISSUE-148 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/148>-8
has already been solved, see:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Feb/0243.html



Kind regards,
Maxime
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2017 10:54:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 February 2017 10:54:08 UTC