- From: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:40:16 +0000
- To: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALsPASXm_tadvciigocS+QXskUvcP=LZe8SUBq1LiEFX3NtkVg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, In [1], Kerry you ask: >Kerry: I am worried about this. This makes all instances of (e.g. > oldssn:MeasurementProperty)s become sosa:ObservableProperty, > when they were only oldssn:Property before. And also when we have that > newssn:MeasurementProperty is not necessarily sosa:ObservableProperty. If > "observationProperty" means anything at all (and I am totally unconvinced that it > does), then this must be wrong? e.g. any oldssn:Accuracy instance becomes a > sosa:ObservableProperty. In the old SSN, the definition of ssn:Property is: "An observable Quality of an Event or Object. That is, not a Quality of an abstract entity, but rather an aspect of an entity that is intrinsic to and cannot exist without the entity and that is observable by a sensor." and then all of the following classes are defined as sub classes of oldssn:Property oldssn:MeasurementCapability oldssn:MeasurementProperty oldssn:MeasurementRange oldssn:Accuracy oldssn:DetectionLimit oldssn:Drift oldssn:Frequency oldssn:Latency oldssn:Precision oldssn:Resolution oldssn:ResponseTime oldssn:Selectivity oldssn:Sensitivity oldssn:MaintenanceSchedule oldssn:OperatingProperty oldssn:OperatingRange oldssn:SurvivalProperty oldssn:SurvivalRange oldssn:SystemLifetime oldssn:OperatingPowerRange oldssn:BatteryLifetime Most of these properties are not observable directly by sensors. Therefore I share your concern and would agree to say that the old definition of oldssn:Property should have been a bit loosen to account for non-observable properties. I added a con to option 5 and added a new Option 6 to the list. You also add: > Having said that, by definition any newssn:Property, > including Accuracy and SurvivalRange and BatteryPower has to be a property of a > FeatureofInterest....(and the FoI would often be a sensor or a system). This seems correct to me, isn't it ? So we could add the following axioms to reflect this ? newssn:MeasurementProperty rdfs:subClassOf [ owl:onProperty newssn:isPropertyOf ; owl:allValuesFrom newssn:Sensor ] . newssn:OperatingProperty rdfs:subClassOf [ owl:onProperty newssn:isPropertyOf ; owl:allValuesFrom newssn:System ] . Kind regards, Maxime [1] - https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Property_and_Observable_Property
Received on Monday, 13 February 2017 17:41:01 UTC