Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice

Linda is prepping a PR with the updated change-log (for Appendix F); we'll
merge that after the vote.


On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 at 10:59 Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com> wrote:

> Excellent - That's great
>
> Thanks
>
> Ed
>
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 at 10:58 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ed - timely question. Linda & I just completed our editor's catch up
> call.
>
> BP document is FROZEN and ready for people to read/review (see previous
> emails in this chain for the change-log).
> VOTE is scheduled for WEDNESDAY during the plenary call.
>
> Thank you. Jeremy
>
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 at 10:53 Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com> wrote:
>
> HI Both,
>
> Are you looking to vote this week ?
>
> Ed
>
>
> On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 at 22:40 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I've now incorporated the final planned updates for this sprint.
>
> BP6 and BP7 now take account of discussions at the London F2F; some of the
> text from BP7 has now found its way to BP14 (linking) and to §12.5.2
> (publishing data with clear semantics).
>
> IMHO, BP14 still needs more work; let's try to get that done in the next
> sprint.
>
> But for now, I'm done. No more changes from me before the vote to release
> another WD.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 at 09:39 Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
> wrote:
>
> Regarding ISSUE 208, I managed to draw their attention to it; waiting to
> see if they get engaged. +1 for leaving the issue open for one more WD
> cycle.
>
>
>
> I just closed Github issues related to BP4:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/179
>
> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/180
>
>
>
> I reviewed Clemens’ rewrite of BP4 and found these issues could be closed.
>
>
>
> This completes my ACTION-260.
>
>
>
> *Van:* Jeremy Tandy [mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com]
> *Verzonden:* vrijdag 3 februari 2017 10:13
> *Aan:* Linda van den Brink; SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)
> *Onderwerp:* Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice
>
>
>
> +1 thanks to Ed & Clemens.
>
> And to Linda for summarising where we are.
>
> I'm on track for mods to BP 7 & 14 (as discussed in London). I also made
> some updates to BP 6 yesterday.
>
> Linda: regarding ISSUE 208 in BP 7, did you manage to engage folks in the
> NL linked data community? We should probably leave the issue open for this
> release if we're pending a check with the TAG too.
>
> Jeremy
>
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 at 08:05, Linda van den Brink <
> l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> In the BP subgroup call this week we discussed the progress that was made
> during the current sprint, when we want to do a new working draft release,
> and what remains to be done.
>
>
>
> There were only a few people on the call, so here’s a summary of the main
> points for the benefit of everyone.
>
> 1: please review BP editor’s draft for next WD release (vote in next call)
>
> 2: please volunteer for work items for the next (and last major!) sprint
>
>
>
> In the _*current*_ sprint we have made good progress, although not
> everything we planned to do actually got done yet.
>
>
>
> Please everyone GET READY to review the BP draft. We decided to freeze the
> current Editor’s draft on _*Monday February 6*_ i.e. the last changes may
> be made on the 5th. After that the draft will be frozen for next WD
> release.
>
>
>
> The Draft will then have the following changes compared to the current WD
> (most but not all of this is done already):
>
> - the BP summary was moved to the top and the BP template explanation was
> removed.
>
> - BP 4 (indexable spatial data) has been expanded by Clemens
>
> - Section 7 Coordinate Reference Systems was edited by Ed
>
> - BP7 (use HTTP URIs) + BP14 (Links to related resources) will be edited
> by Jeremy based on discussion at the December 2016 face to face meeting in
> London
>
> - BP17 (crowdsourcing) was removed from the BP document, an example around
> crowdsourcing and the importance of knowing the source of data was added to
> BP1 (metadata).
>
>
>
> The following were planned as well and had a volunteer but were not
> completed in time. These will automatically go in the next sprint:
>
> - Action 241: Further work on best practices 3 and 18 about Coordinate
> Reference Systems (possibly merging them). (Byron)
>
> - Action 249: Further work on BP8 (geometry) (Andrea)
>
>
>
> The _*next*_ sprint is actually, according to our own schedule, the last
> one where we do substantial additions / changes. It is the last sprint but
> one, and in the last sprint we only want to do editorial changes. However
> there is a lot still to be done. It’s really important to stress at this
> point that we editors need the help of the working group members, because
> anything that doesn’t get written between now and the end of March will not
> make it into the final document!
>
>
>
> I asked this during the call, and I will ask again now: Take a look at the
> Backlog and volunteer for one or more of the items on that list! Any items
> that get a volunteer will move to the sprint plan for the next sprint.
> Anything that remains stuck on the backlog is in danger of dropping out of
> the BP entirely.
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document#Backlog_-_To_do
>
>
>
> A BIG thanks to Ed and Clemens for their work during this sprint!
>
>
>
> Linda
>
> --
>
> *Ed Parsons *FRGS
> Geospatial Technologist, Google
>
> Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501
> www.edparsons.com @edparsons
>
> --
>
> *Ed Parsons *FRGS
> Geospatial Technologist, Google
>
> Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501
> www.edparsons.com @edparsons
>