Re: ssn: issue-72 inverse properties in sosa-core

Dear all,

I don't want to mess around with the decisions that may have been taken
already, and that I may not be aware of.
but this issue-72 is still open so I thought it could be worth adding my
two cents there :

If we are so much keen in using pseudo, non Linked-data-conforming
properties from schema.org , maybe it's important to let you know the
following:

There is a third possibility for inverseOf:

(A)    The pair is to be related by an owl:InverseOf declaration; or
(B)    ruled-out:  The pair are not to be axiomatically  related but
documentation is to be used to make the  inverse intention clear
(C)   The pair is to be related by a schema:inverseOf pseudo axiom.

To me, using that pseudo property could help remove OWL axioms completely
from the term definitions.

A camp was at 8 and B camp was at 1.
How many would like to change from camp A to camp C ?

Kind regards,
Maxime

Le jeu. 10 nov. 2016 à 04:00, Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu> a
écrit :

> [Just for book keeping and without implying that this is an official vote]
>
> This would bring the A camp to 8 and the B camp to 1 vote.
>
>
> On 11/09/2016 04:05 AM, Raúl García Castro wrote:
> > El 9/11/16 a las 5:07, Raphaël Troncy escribió:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >>> At the next ssn meeting this will be put to the vote.  The decision to
> >>> be made is between  either A or B below.
> >>
> >> FWIW, I would vote for (A): "The pair is to be related by an
> >> owl:InverseOf declaration".
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Me too.
> >
>
>
> --
> Krzysztof Janowicz
>
> Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
> 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060
>
> Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu
> Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/
> Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
>
>
>