W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > February 2017

Re: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes

From: Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:44:04 -0800
To: Maxime Lefran├žois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <acdd07ec-efd7-47b9-3038-ec4ce3c85ac1@ucsb.edu>
I think we had schema before but changed it to meta, does anybody 
remember why?

On 02/08/2017 04:53 AM, Maxime Lefran├žois wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> about these pseudo, non Linked-Data compliant properties 
> domainIncludes and rangeIncludes
>
> sosa.ttl uses
>
> @prefix meta: <http://meta.schema.org/> .
>
> and then:
>
> sosa:hasSample meta:rangeIncludes sosa:Sample .
>
> Yet,
>  - meta is not a registered prefix for http://meta.schema.org/ at 
> prefix.cc
>  - the actual canonical URL for rangeIncludes is 
> http://schema.org/domainIncludes, as stated at its URL: extension 
> terms can be used in schema.org <http://schema.org> markup in the 
> normal manner; it is not necessary for markup publishers to indicate 
> which extension a term is currently in. Terms may move between 
> extensions over time (e.g. frompending <http://pending.schema.org/>to 
> the core) without the need for the corresponding markup to change.
>  - the registered prefix for http://schema.org/ is schema: at prefix.cc
>
> So I suggest:
>  - we use prefix: @prefix schema: <http://schema.org/> .
>  - we change any mention of meta:domainIncludes into schema:domainIncludes
>  - we change any mention of meta:rangeIncludes into schema:rangeIncludes
> Best,
> Maxime


-- 
Krzysztof Janowicz

Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060

Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu
Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/
Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2017 16:44:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:29 UTC