W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > February 2017

Question on Resolution 3 in the minutes of 21/02, Was: Updated the wiki according to the minutes, and implementation of ACTION-269: name of the link between Actuator and ActuatableProperty

From: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:52:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CALsPASXF3sgKLuZbTDH_U+qmX0X--AW1-MX2bQ3AeDvDcc2dCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: janowicz@ucsb.edu, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Dear all,

Resolution 3 in the minutes is: Use of sosa:actsOnProperty/sosa:isActedOnBy
for connecting Actuation to ActuatableProperty

I just noticed that this option was not an option in the wiki. Instead, the
closest option is:  sosa:actsOn/sosa:isActedOnBy, this is the one that
is marked as: "voted on"

In the update on sosa.ttl, Jano implemented one from the resolution:
sosa:actsOnProperty/sosa:isActedOnBy


Therefore there is an incoherence in the wiki and the sosa.ttl .
Shall I edit the wiki, or shall we vote again to solve this incoherence
next meeting ?

sosa:isActedOnBy has been agreed upon.
The two options for its inverse  are: sosa:actsOnProperty and  sosa:actsOn

Personnaly, I am ok with the resolution, I would like:
- actsOnProperty to be the name of the link between Actuation and
ActuatableProperty
 - actsOn to be the name of the link between Actuation and FeatureOfInterest

Kind regards,
Maxime

Le mer. 22 févr. 2017 18:05, Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu> a
écrit :

> I updated the wiki page according to the Resolved Proposals ,

I did the same yesterday :-).


On 02/22/2017 02:46 AM, Maxime Lefrançois wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I updated the wiki page according to the Resolved Proposals ,
>
> See https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Actuation
>
> Question 2: naming of xxxProperty --> resolved,
>   we voted on sosa:ActuatableProperty
>
> Question 3: naming of the link between Actuation and
> ActuatableProperty --> resolved
>   we voted  on sosa:actsOn/sosa:isActedOnBy
>  (actually there is a problem here, the PROPOSAL referred to an option
> that was not in the wiki. This  option is the closest)
>
> Question 3': new question, naming of the link between Observation and
> ObservableProperty
>
> Question 4: naming of the link between Actuation and Actuator --> resolved
>   we voted  on sosa:madeActuation/sosa:actuationMadeBy
> (problem: the wrong option was emphasized as being the one we voted on
> in the wiki)
>
> Question 4': naming of the link between Observation and Sensor
>
> ...
>
> Then I added according to ACTION-269:
>
> Question 10: naming of the link between Actuator and ActuatableProperty
>
> Question 10': naming of the link between Sensor and ObservableProperty
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Maxime


--
Krzysztof Janowicz

Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060

Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu
Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/
Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2017 14:53:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:30 UTC