- From: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:15:32 +0000
- To: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <FA80F386-120F-47A0-A418-7440A4368119@anu.edu.au>
Dear all, In today’s plenary meeting it seemed as if we cannot separate the mechanics of the namespace issue<https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/NamespaceIssue> from the different options of integrating the SOSA core with SSN. I have now tried to summarise these integration options on a separate wiki page: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Integration_Issue I have come up with *four* options that have been proposed in one way or the other over the last couple of months. I tried to keep the explanation of the four options as abstract as possible. Please, especially the SSN subgroup members, do not add technical details on how each option would be achieved through redirects on the server etc. I have also deliberately chosen the word “Implications” rather than “Advantages” and “Disadvantages”, because what is an Advantage for someone may be a Disadvantage for someone else. The ontology experts in the group, please do have a look at these options and correct any potential mistakes. Also, if you can think of a radically different option, please do add it to the Wiki. If it is only a small departure from an existing option, maybe add it to the implications section rather than creating a new option instead. For example, not all relations in Option 3 necessarily must be subclass/subproperty relations, but can also be equivalent class/property. But subclass is the axiomatically weaker one. I hope that this helps us to arrive at a resolution in our next SDW meeting. Kind regards, Armin
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2017 06:16:14 UTC