Ahem... https://www.w3.org/ns/dqv.ttl https://www.w3.org/ns/dcat.ttl https://www.w3.org/ns/duv.ttl All use voaf and vann because we want them to show up in LOV :-) On 07/02/2017 20:35, Ghislain Atemezing wrote: > Re visibility and reusing ontologies…. >> Le 7 févr. 2017 à 21:01, Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu> a écrit : >> >> At least not in my experience working with them. If they see that 'xyz' is used in an ontology they are going to use, then they would like to find out what xyz is and if they find out that it is an ontology that has been created years ago by a private person and that there is no support for it and no other major player is using said ontology, they will be unhappy. > > > I am afraid, they will certainly only use schema.org <http://schema.org/> in the next years :) > > Best, > Ghislain > -------------------------------------------- > Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D > R&D Engineer SemWeb > @ Mondeca, Paris, France > Labs: http://labs.mondeca.com <http://labs.mondeca.com/> > Tel: +33 (0)1 4111 3034 > Web: www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com/> > Twitter: @gatemezing > About Me: https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing <https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing> > -- Phil Archer Data Strategist, W3C http://www.w3.org/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 20:46:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:29 UTC