Monday, 31 December 2007
- Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: HTML 5 Tutorials and authoring
- Re: Underline element.
Sunday, 30 December 2007
Saturday, 29 December 2007
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
Friday, 28 December 2007
- Re: HTML 5 Tutorials and authoring
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
Thursday, 27 December 2007
Friday, 28 December 2007
- Re: HTML 5 Tutorials and authoring
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: HTML 5 Tutorials and authoring
- Re: HTML 5 Tutorials and authoring
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
Thursday, 27 December 2007
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Re: Underline element.
- Underline element.
- Re: HTML 5 Tutorials and authoring Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
- Re: HTML 5 Tutorials and authoring Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
- HTML 5 Tutorials and authoring Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
- Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
Wednesday, 26 December 2007
Tuesday, 25 December 2007
Monday, 24 December 2007
- Decision Making (was: Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG)
- Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
- Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- Commenting on Joe Clark's "They Shoot Standardistas, Don't They?"
Sunday, 23 December 2007
- Re: Progressive Implementation Report
- Re: Public Understanding of the Timeframe of HTMl 5 Development
Saturday, 22 December 2007
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- Re: Progressive Implementation Report
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- Progressive Implementation Report (was: Public Understanding of the Timeframe of HTMl 5 Development)
- Re: <script> for non-script content
Friday, 21 December 2007
- Re: <script> for non-script content
- <script> for non-script content
- Re: Public Understanding of the Timeframe of HTMl 5 Development
- Subject: [HDP] 3.1 Solve Real Problems
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- Re: Reanimate <xmp>
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- {minutes} HTML WG teleconference 2007-12-20
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
Thursday, 20 December 2007
- January 22 publication date [was: Transition and publication requests initiated for HTML5 FPWD]
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: New entities
- Re: Evaluating HTTP Methods in the Spec
Wednesday, 19 December 2007
Thursday, 20 December 2007
Wednesday, 19 December 2007
- Re: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
- Re: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
- Re: Reserved keystrokes for borwsers and operating system functions
- RE: Reserved keystrokes for borwsers and operating system functions
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- Re: Evaluating HTTP Methods in the Spec
- Re: An Overview of SMIL Timing and Media Attributes for Audio and Video Objects.
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- Re: [XHR] send doesn’t explain what to do when method is GET
- Re: [XHR] send doesn’t explain what to do when method is GET
- Re: [XHR] send doesn’t explain what to do when method is GET
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- Re: Evaluating HTTP Methods in the Spec
- Re: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
- Transition and publication requests initiated for HTML5 FPWD [was: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008]
- Re: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
- Re: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
- Re: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
- Re: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
- Re: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
- ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
Tuesday, 18 December 2007
- Re: Evaluating HTTP Methods in the Spec
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- news from the W3C Video Workshop: ISSUE-6 videoaudio, ISSUE-7 video-codecs
- Re: Evaluating HTTP Methods in the Spec
- Re: [whatwg] Acronyms & Abbreviations whatwg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 90
- Re: Evaluating HTTP Methods in the Spec
- Evaluating HTTP Methods in the Spec
Monday, 17 December 2007
Tuesday, 18 December 2007
- Re: [XHR] send doesn’t explain what to do when method is GET
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: [XHR] send doesn’t explain what to do when method is GET
Monday, 17 December 2007
- Re: Copypaste error in vague date parsing algorithm
- Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
Friday, 14 December 2007
- Re: Public Understanding of the Timeframe of HTMl 5 Development
- Canvas gradients should not be optional
- Re: [whatwg] Acronyms & Abbreviations whatwg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 90
- Re: [whatwg] Acronyms & Abbreviations whatwg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 90
- Re: ISSUE-15 immediate-mode-graphics proposal carries over objections
Thursday, 13 December 2007
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- junkmail
- Re: [whatwg] Acronyms & Abbreviations whatwg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 90
- RE: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work
- Restatement of the outline algorithm
- [WF2] <form target> is not allowed
- Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work
- Re: DogFood, take 2
- Re: DogFood, take 2
- 13 Dec HTML WG teleconference is cancelled [was: any HTML WG teleconference agenda...]
Wednesday, 12 December 2007
- Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work
Tuesday, 11 December 2007
Wednesday, 12 December 2007
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: Video codec requirements changed [ISSUE-7 video-codecs]
- any HTML WG teleconference agenda for this week?
- Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: Video codec requirements changed
- Video codec requirements changed
- Re: Video codec requirements changed
- Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed
- Re: US-centricity of the Ogg problem
Tuesday, 11 December 2007
- Re: Video codec requirements changed
- US-centricity of the Ogg problem
- Video codec requirements changed
- Re: Video codec requirements changed
- key/value-based storage comments
- SQL API comments
- Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element
- {minutes} HTML WG teleconference 2007-11-29
- Re: Public Understanding of the Timeframe of HTMl 5 Development
- Re: Public Understanding of the Timeframe of HTMl 5 Development
- Video codec requirements changed
- Re: Storage API
- Re: Detailed review of 4.11. Client-side persistent storage
- {minutes} HTML WG teleconference 2007-11-06 [resend]
Monday, 10 December 2007
- Re: Reanimate <xmp>
- Re: Reanimate <xmp>
- Re: Reanimate <xmp>
- Re: Reanimate <xmp>
- Re: Reanimate <xmp>
- Re: Reanimate <xmp>
- Re: Reanimate <xmp>
- Re: Reanimate <xmp>
Sunday, 9 December 2007
- Copypaste error in vague date parsing algorithm
- Re: Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
- Re: Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
- Re: Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
- Reanimate <xmp>
Saturday, 8 December 2007
- Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status)
- Re: Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
- Re: Add an @type attribute on code
- Re: Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
- Re: Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
- Re: Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
- Re: Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
- Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
- Re: Add an @type attribute on code
- Re: Public Understanding of the Timeframe of HTMl 5 Development
Friday, 7 December 2007
- Public Understanding of the Timeframe of HTMl 5 Development
- Add an @type attribute on code
- Re: ISSUE-26: accessibility/usability of HTML5 and W3C default stylesheets [W3C publications]
- Re: DogFood, take 2
- Re: DogFood, take 2
- Re: DogFood, take 2
- Re: validator being a reference Re: DogFood, take 2
- Re: DogFood
- Re: DogFood, take 2
- Re: validator being a reference Re: DogFood, take 2
- Re: DogFood
- Re: DogFood, take 2
- Re: DogFood (<wbr>)
- validator being a reference Re: DogFood, take 2
- Re: DogFood, take 2
Thursday, 6 December 2007
- ISSUE-15 immediate-mode-graphics proposal carries over objections
- Re: DogFood, take 2
- Re: DogFood, take 2
- Re: DogFood (<wbr>)
- Re: DogFood, take 2
- Re: ISSUE-27 (rel-ownership): @rel value ownership, registry consideration [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- DogFood, take 2
- Re: DogFood
- ISSUE-27 (rel-ownership): @rel value ownership, registry consideration [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
- Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
- Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
- Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
- Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
- Re: DogFood (<wbr>)
- Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
- Re: DogFood
- Re: DogFood
- Re: DogFood
- Re: DogFood
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: DogFood
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
- Re: DogFood
- Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
- Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
- Re: DogFood
Wednesday, 5 December 2007
- Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
- Re: DogFood
- Re: DogFood
- Re: DogFood
- Re: DogFood
- DogFood
- Re: Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
- Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
- Re: Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
- Re: Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
- Re: Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
- Re: Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
- Re: Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
- Re: Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
- Re: Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
- Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
- A Preview of HTML 5 on A List Apart
Tuesday, 4 December 2007
- Re: About media=handheld?
- Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status)
- Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status)
- Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
Monday, 3 December 2007
- Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status)
- Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
- Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
- ISSUE-26: accessibility/usability of HTML5 and W3C default stylesheets [W3C publications]
- Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
- Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
- Re: About media=handheld?
- Re: About media=handheld?
- Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
- Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
- Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
Sunday, 2 December 2007
- Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
- Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
- Re: style attribute, only on font?
- Re: style attribute, only on font?
- Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
- Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
- Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
Saturday, 1 December 2007
Sunday, 2 December 2007
Saturday, 1 December 2007
- Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
- Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
- Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
- Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
- Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
- RE: ... other formats in HTML ...
- Re: Unclear what: "For interoperability, authors are advised to avoid optional features of XML" means.
- Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
- ... other formats in HTML ...
- Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element?
- Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
- Re: Unclear what: "For interoperability, authors are advised to avoid optional features of XML" means.
- Added SVG To Wiki
- Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
- Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
- Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
- Unclear what: "For interoperability, authors are advised to avoid optional features of XML" means.
- Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
- Re: Request to assess JS/graphics perf. issues on embedded devices [was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19)
- ISSUE-25 (js/graphics-vs-emb.devices): Request to assess JS/graphics perf. issues on embedded devices [HTML 5 spec]
- Re: Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause [was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19)
- ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
- Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19)
- Request to assess JS/graphics perf. issues on embedded devices [was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19)
- Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause [was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19)
- Additions to HTML/Guide Wiki