- From: Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:14:48 +0900
- To: public-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20071211091447.GF8829@sideshowbarker>
[realized today that I had neglected to send these previously; sending now so that they get picked up by trackbot] http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html Agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Nov/0405.html Present ChrisWilson DanC Gregory_Rosmaita Julian Justin Lachy MikeSmith anne Shawn Simon Chair ChrisWilson Scribe MikeSmith * Topics 1. Open Action Items 2. Issue 4, Video Codecs 3. ACTION 5, task force for developer community outreach (on Karl) 4. canvas survey questions 5. Other current issues being discussion on public-html in discussing any of the other open issues that have seen recent discussion? * Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ Open Action Items http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/agenda http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/agenda <Gregory> GJR: notes that PF has invited simon pieters to join to expedite the process http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/8 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/8 "Discuss with PFWG role attribute vs aria attribute", on Michael Cooper <DanC> I updated actions/8 keeping Action 8 open pending more talk with Michael Cooper http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/13 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/13 "Talk to WebAPI and WAF WGs about their role in offline API stuff and how they work with and contribute to the discussion", on chaals <Gregory> last PF WG meeting (MC's action discussed) - member confidential archive: http://www.w3.org/2007/11/26-pf-minutes.html http://www.w3.org/2007/11/26-pf-minutes.html ChrisW will bring up Action 13 with HCG <DanC> updated actions/13 reassigned to ChrisW, due 13 Dec ChrisWilson: what prompted this action? DanC: yeah, Saturday f2f discussion about offline Web apps http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/23 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/23 "coordinate comparative tests using competing ARIA proposals" Gregory - ran into problem with chair of PF group ... scribe: they think it's an "undue burden" ... there's a push to get it resolved ... ... tomorrow morning there is a meeting with zcorpan (Simon Pieters) to discuss adoption of his ARIA proposal ... <DanC> (meeting tomorrow? a pointer to mail from whoever is running that meeting would be handy) <DanC> (er... are we talking about aria-role in substance here or just updating the action status?) Gregory: OK to [declare] a role without declaring a namespace (they agreed to this compromise) ... have been working with XHTML2 people ... <zcorpan> DanC, http://www.w3.org/mid/p06110409c3749ffc266b@%5B192.168.1.102%5D http://www.w3.org/mid/p06110409c3749ffc266b@%5B192.168.1.102%5D Gregory: now need to broker with developers ... ... I can report back about this [after the meeting tomorrow] <DanC> (which we agreed?) ChrisWilson: DanC you noted that you wanted examples DanC: yep <DanC> (I got the pointers I needed.) <DanC> (3 meetings GR just mentioned... pointers please) <Gregory> friday 30 november 2007 - meeting with simon pieters http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-wai-pf/2007OctDec/0257.h tml http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-wai-pf/2007OctDec/0257.html <DanC> I marked ACTION-23 withdrawn <scribe> ACTION: Gregory to report back after 11-30 meeting on ARIA syntax [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-30 - Report back after 11-30 meeting on ARIA syntax [on Gregory Rosmaita - due 2007-12-06]. DanC: W3C process requires 7-day notice for meetings Gregory: this is an attempt to work with the vendors who are supportive of ARIA [discussion of getting "PF ducks in a row" and "mutual reality check" <Zakim> DanC, you wanted to note regrets for next week 6 Dec DanC notes he won't be here next week; ChrisWilson will chair again <DanC> next meeting: 6 Dec, Chris W to chair [moving on to discussion of Pending Review AIs] Issue 4, Video Codecs <DanC> [homework] summary of the video (and audio) codec discussion http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Nov/0153.html http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/agenda http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/agenda ChrisWilson: this seems complete[d] DanC will be at the Video Workshop http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Nov/0153.htm l http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Nov/0153.html above is posting from Dave Singer <DanC> ACTION: Dan see that Singer's summary makes it to the SJC/Dec W3C video workshop, possibly by confirming Singer's attendance [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html#action02] <trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-31 - See that Singer's summary makes it to the SJC/Dec W3C video workshop, possibly by confirming Singer's attendance [on Dan Connolly - due 2007-12-06]. ACTION 5, task force for developer community outreach (on Karl) http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/5 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/5 <Shawn> fyi: Dave Singer's email was tacked on to the issue for video-codecs: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/7 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/7 <Zakim> MikeSmith, you wanted to comment on Karl's proposal <DanC> ok by me, action done... now what next... a note and a wiki topic look OK to me Lachy - I'm trying to incorporate Karl's proposal into my draft ... scribe: as well as stuff from Roger <DanC> ok: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/products/5 Product HTML 5 authoring guidelines http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/products/5 <DanC> yeah, not a good name. Mike to fix <DanC> (did lachy take an action) <scribe> ACTION: MikeSmith to change the product name of "HTML 5 authoring guidelines" in the tracker to something else, eventually [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html#action03] <trackbot-ng> Sorry, couldn't find user - MikeSmith <scribe> ACTION: Michael(tm) to change the product name of "HTML 5 authoring guidelines" in the tracker to something else, eventually [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html#action04] <trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-32 - Change the product name of \"HTML 5 authoring guidelines\" in the tracker to something else, eventually [on Michael(tm) Smith - due 2007-12-06]. <Lachy> DanC, what action would you like me to take? canvas survey questions <DanC> good question. maybe none, for now <Lachy> ok http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/req-gapi-canvas/ http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/req-gapi-canvas/ <DanC> . ACTION: Lachy prepare web developer guide for publication as a Note <DanC> yup, regular web pages or blogs are fine by me Justin: [suggestion about considering blog items] DanC - I consider the series-of-blog items to be a fairly comfortable way of publishing this kind of information. <DanC> ACTION: Lachy prepare web developer guide for publication as a Note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html#action05] <trackbot-ng> Sorry, couldn't find user - Lachy <DanC> ACTION: Lachy prepare web developer guide, maybe as a Note, maybe other [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html#action06] <trackbot-ng> Sorry, couldn't find user - Lachy <DanC> ( <DanC> (Lachy, can I add you to the issue tracking task force? i.e. will you be in touch with the chairs regularly?) Lachy: we want to be able to update the info after we publish it <anne> That's possible with a Note <ChrisWilson> (i.e. the content will change as the HTML5 spec changes) <DanC> (I presume so...) <anne> You just publish another Note <ChrisWilson> sure Lachy: blogs are good for describing current state of things but not for things that need to be updated <DanC> ACTION: ChrisWilson to investigate an HTML WG blog, a la the way the I18N WG does it [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html#action07] <trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-33 - Investigate an HTML WG blog, a la the way the I18N WG does it [on Chris Wilson - due 2007-12-06]. <DanC> due jan Other current issues being discussion on public-html in discussing any of the other open issues that have seen recent discussion? <ChrisWilson> (or haven't seen recent discussion?) DanC - you can assign that issue to Lachlan now <Gregory> GJR: would like a continuation on http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/24 - I've noted in the tracker the steps taken so far, and am in the process of finalizing a tweaked stylesheet for review http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/24 [discussion of nonconformance of the style attribute in HTML5] ChrisWilson: how are we tracking follow-up and resolution on these issues? DanC: there is a new testing task force? <Lachy> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/ http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/ <Lachy> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2007No v/0001.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2007Nov/0001.html http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/26 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/26 <Zakim> DanC, you wanted to note another idea: an edited series of blog articles above is about testsuite stuff <Zakim> MikeSmith, you wanted to talk about testsuite stuff http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-issue-trackin g/2007Nov/0006.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-issue-tracking/2007Nov/0006.html <DanC> ah... test suite product is already there... http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/products/4 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/products/4 <ChrisWilson> Tracker watching public-html; the public-issue-tracking is for discussing how we do issue tracking. <ChrisWilson> Above was DanC <Shawn> Lachy: it was primarily for discussion of issues with the Tracker software... and yes... what ChrisWilson said. <Lachy> ok, so it's not something I need to subscribe to (I'm on too many lists already :-)) <ChrisWilson> I believe that is true, yes. <ChrisWilson> I don't think I'm subscribed. <Shawn> We just didn't want to clutter public-html with noise on backoffice issues <Julian> No, I didn't. [discussion about mailing lists and interaction with tracker: <ChrisWilson> Any other issues? <ChrisWilson> Motion to adjourn? [no objections to adjourning heard] <ChrisWilson> ADJOURN Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: ChrisWilson to investigate an HTML WG blog, a la the way the I18N WG does it [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html#action07] [NEW] ACTION: Dan see that Singer's summary makes it to the SJC/Dec W3C video workshop, possibly by confirming Singer's attendance [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html#action02] [NEW] ACTION: Gregory to report back after 11-30 meeting on ARIA syntax [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html#action01] [NEW] ACTION: Lachy prepare web developer guide for publication as a Note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html#action05] [NEW] ACTION: Lachy prepare web developer guide, maybe as a Note, maybe other [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html#action06] [NEW] ACTION: Michael(tm) to change the product name of "HTML 5 authoring guidelines" in the tracker to sometthing else, eventually [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html#action04] [NEW] ACTION: MikeSmith to change the product name of "HTML 5 authoring guidelines" in the tracker to sometthing else, eventually [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html#action03]
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2007 09:15:03 UTC