- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:39:07 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
- cc: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ian@hixie.ch (Ian Hickson) wrote: >Since we are encouraged to publish sooner rather than later, and since >there doesn't appear to be any reason for us not to publish immediately I'm concerned that the video codec issue in particular, along with the looming holiday madness, makes this an unfortunate time to publish. The video codec text that included Ogg was the one voted on by the WG to “adopt for further discussion”, and it's been removed without any obvious consensus in the WG (and, in fact, seems to have been quite controversial)[0]. Since some of the main issues surrounding video codecs are legal in nature, and the publication of FPWD has relevant legal implications, publishing now and with this change will have consequences down the road. If nothing else, it invites the inversion of the burden of proof in future arguments; since the various member's legal teams will do their review based on the FPWD, the onus is suddenly on the proponents of Ogg to argue for its addition, rather then on the opponents to argue for its removal. Further, rushed publication close to the holidays is a classic no-no (which, I would guess, is a main reason for the W3C moratorium). It forces people to either silently assent to something they may or may not support without sufficient opportunity to make an informed decision, or to object on principle (which most people find uncomfortable). If our heartbeat requirement says we need to publish FPWD by 2008-02-26 then I would suggest we aim for publication on that date and use the time to aggressively address any issues. That is, direct the WG to focus on identifying and addressing any issues relevant to FPWD to the exclusion of issues that can be adressed after FPWD, in order to meet our heartbeat requirement. If the consensus of the WG in late January is that we are ready we might then publish before our requirement, but any date prior to 2008-02-01 creates — IMO — the possibility that the holidays will affect the WG's ability to make a good decision. I would encourage the Chairs and Editors to consider well issues such as these before rushing through publication of FPWD less than a week from Christmas. [0] — To the point where I considered mirroring Nokia's request and asking to have the original text reinstated using much the same argument they did. - -- “The woods are lovely, dark, and deep; But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep; And miles to go before I sleep...” -- Robert Frost, “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening” -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.9 wj8DBQFHaOa6o/I+siR19ewRAtVAAJsFXPwReYl5mDv6ntKWUWAuStMBGQCgmn3C SfRehhT5j99AWyfI/Df4obg=s3wV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2007 09:39:24 UTC