- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 21:34:18 +0900
- To: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- Cc: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Le 5 déc. 2007 à 19:54, James Graham a écrit : > Per the requirements in section 3.8.11, <blockquote>s are opaque in > terms of headings i.e. any headings inside blockquotes are not > considered part of the main document's heading structure. Therefore > they would presumably also be exempt from any conformance > requirement on the document's headings. Yes I understood what was written in the spec. They are not opaque for XSLT or the DOM, and for style. It creates challenges when you want to extract the information. I agree with the definition of opacity, even if it's a bit loosy now. I should try to come up with a definition or better a series of test cases and implementing it in http://www.w3.org/2003/12/semantic-extractor.html >> Use case 2 >> I'm writing a long document, article. I'm not sure yet about the >> sections and the level of headings. >> What the authoring tool should do? >> Create empty headings? > > I have no idea what you're trying to say here. If you're just saying > that documents undergoing transition may not always be in conforming > states, I don't see how that is unique to this issue, or > surprising. Can you elaborate a bit please? At which moment, Lachlan suggests that the document conforms? Think for example a wiki which is in perpetual evolution. -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 12:34:29 UTC