- From: j.j. <moz@jeka.info>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:36:28 +0100
- To: Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@gmail.com>: hodd gsachd: > That being said, I'm really not convinced that XMP is needed at all: > you only have to do a search/replace for & to & (you're already > doing it anyway) and < to < (other characters don't need any > special treatment). It's a great benefit ecpecially (but not only) for inexperienced authors. And author's requirements have currently higher priority for us than theoretical purity. <http://www.w3.org/TR/html-design-principles/#priority-of-constituencies> j.j
Received on Monday, 10 December 2007 13:37:06 UTC