- From: Preston L. Bannister <preston@bannister.us>
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:02:05 -0800
- To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: "Ben Boyle" <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com>, "public-html@w3.org Public List" <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <7e91ba7e0712262102k721872a4pfd33924666714ad7@mail.gmail.com>
> > Le 27 déc. 2007 à 12:25, Ben Boyle a écrit : > > I think I'll just read mails for now. In 2008, I'd like to try > > tutorials. I don't know if that will be more useful but it feels like > > it could be productive. We've got Lachie's ALA article, are there any > > others out there? Are we keeping a list? On Dec 26, 2007 7:52 PM, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/tasks83/results#xtasks > "tutorial development, quick reference, course materials, ... 49" > 49 volunteers to work with you. Plenty of space for organizing here. > It seems the things which have been successful in the group so far: > start and ask help (more than ask how to work). > > A review of Authoring tools on different platform could also help. > http://www.w3.org/2007/07/html-authoring-tools/ [snip] OK. Well I've used (in order) Homesite, TopStyle, and now Aptana. TopStyle I would highly recommend for more code-oriented non-wysiwyg developers on Windows. So looked at the above W3C page, then went to look at what was already written for TopStyle (no point in repeating what was said before). Came across: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TopStyle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTML_editors http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_HTML_editors Hmm ... I do not see much point in duplicating what has already been said, and the general description better serves the greater good on Wikipedia, rather than on a more obscure W3C WG-related page. Backing up a step - I am not sure what purpose the Authoring (x)HTML documents <http://www.w3.org/2007/07/html-authoring-tools/> page is meant to serve. Any general information is better dropped into the Wikipedia page. Perhaps the W3C page would be better focused to reference Wikipedia page for general information. Any comments specific to the WG can go on the W3C page. Then again - what question(s) are that page meant to answer?
Received on Thursday, 27 December 2007 05:02:22 UTC