- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:38:47 +0900
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: Wesley_Upchurch/Semcoinc%SEMCOINC@semcoinc.com, public-html@w3.org
Le 18 déc. 2007 à 03:10, David Carlisle a écrit : >> I think the biggest difference is that <blockquote> is an element >> meant >> to contain quotations that are themselves block level while <q> isn't >> meant to contain block level elements. > > no one would disagree with that. The issue is exactly about the awkward inline/block definition http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/2006JulSep/0077 which leads to create double elements * code/blockcode * q/blockquote If we didn't have the content compatibility constraints, I would remove the nature of block/inline to elements like address, cite, q, code, etc. Unfortunately… -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2007 01:38:55 UTC