w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from February 2002 by thread

a few questions about literals Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 27 February)

Fwd: Addition to Pubrules: New Pubrules Checker Available Brian McBride (Wednesday, 27 February)

RE: possible way out of maze? [was: Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstan ding Issues ]] Ronald Daniel (Wednesday, 27 February)

Datatyping "code" for testing and consideration Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 27 February)

Datatyping Ontology Mike Dean (Tuesday, 26 February)

Minutes for 2002-02-22 RDF Core Telecon Aaron Swartz (Tuesday, 26 February)

revised datatyping proposal, now twopence colored Pat Hayes (Sunday, 24 February)

the S-B problem and what to do about it. Pat Hayes (Sunday, 24 February)

revised datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Sunday, 24 February)

Some experimental CWM rules for datatyping idioms Patrick Stickler (Sunday, 24 February)

Four thousand words on datatyping... Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 23 February)

Re: dizzying datatypes discussions [was: Occam-slashed datatypes] Pat Hayes (Friday, 22 February)

Re: Test cases (entailment) ... Was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-22 Brian McBride (Friday, 22 February)

Occam-slashed datatypes Pat Hayes (Friday, 22 February)

Re: Even more simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Friday, 22 February)

Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-22 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Thursday, 21 February)

Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Dave Beckett (Thursday, 21 February)

FW: Even more simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler (Thursday, 21 February)

answers to quiz (was: Re: simplified datatyping proposal) Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)

telecon at the f2f Brian McBride (Wednesday, 20 February)

weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride (Wednesday, 20 February)

Proposal for fragment identifiers in RDF Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 20 February)

Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)

simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)

A concern with the Datatyping proposal Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 19 February)

Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Brian McBride (Tuesday, 19 February)

XML Base - discussion + test cases Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 19 February)

Re: URIs vs. URIviews (Pat's questions) Aaron Swartz (Tuesday, 19 February)

Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Jos De_Roo (Tuesday, 19 February)

Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Jos De_Roo (Tuesday, 19 February)

Re: URIs vs. URIviews (core issue) Aaron Swartz (Monday, 18 February)

a theory of rdf:Bags Dan Connolly (Sunday, 17 February)

RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-15 Dave Beckett (Saturday, 16 February)

Interpretation Use Cases for Datatyping (and Union to the rescue) Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 16 February)

Use case for tidy literal subjects (ignore if not interested) Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 16 February)

property formerly known as rdf:value Pat Hayes (Saturday, 16 February)

Concerns about reification Sergey Melnik (Friday, 15 February)

Provenance usage scenario - releaseTime Ronald Daniel (Friday, 15 February)

Datatyping use cases Patrick Stickler (Friday, 15 February)

Exact ranges and using S-B Sergey Melnik (Friday, 15 February)

regrets and reification Dan Brickley (Friday, 15 February)

entailment test cases and namespace entailment jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Friday, 15 February)

Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler (Friday, 15 February)

datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Pat Hayes (Friday, 15 February)

Datatyping Graham Klyne (Thursday, 14 February)

happy valentines day, New RDF Model Theory Working Draft published Eric Miller (Thursday, 14 February)

Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Thursday, 14 February)

ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Brian McBride (Wednesday, 13 February)

call for agenda items Brian McBride (Wednesday, 13 February)

F2F Objectives and Agenda Brian McBride (Tuesday, 12 February)

A collection of issue resolutions Brian McBride (Tuesday, 12 February)

Reification: proposed resolution Brian McBride (Tuesday, 12 February)

rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure [was Re: Outstanding Issues] Dave Beckett (Monday, 11 February)

xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Dave Beckett (Monday, 11 February)

Outstanding Issues Brian McBride (Monday, 11 February)

doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Sunday, 10 February)

simple entailment testcase [Was: Re: reification test case] jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Saturday, 9 February)

One final step to datatyping convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler (Friday, 8 February)

Minutes, 2002-02-08 teleconference Graham Klyne (Friday, 8 February)

BagID issue link Jeremy Carroll (Friday, 8 February)

BagID issue link Jeremy Carroll (Friday, 8 February)

Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable) Brian McBride (Friday, 8 February)

MT publication, dropped ball Dan Brickley (Friday, 8 February)

Some words about formal semantics Graham Klyne (Thursday, 7 February)

Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-08 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Thursday, 7 February)

RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Ronald Daniel (Thursday, 7 February)

Dublin Core and multiple element concerns Dave Beckett (Thursday, 7 February)

Dublin Core and multiple element concern Dave Beckett (Thursday, 7 February)

RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Brian McBride (Thursday, 7 February)

Fwd: Connectivity at the Tech Plenary Brian McBride (Thursday, 7 February)

Datatypes Convergence Brian McBride (Wednesday, 6 February)

ACTION 2002-01-24#4 responses on datatyping Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 6 February)

summary of reification? Sergey Melnik (Tuesday, 5 February)

RE: PRISM and multiple element concern - CORRECTION Ronald Daniel (Tuesday, 5 February)

RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Ronald Daniel (Tuesday, 5 February)

PRISM and multiple element concern Ronald Daniel (Tuesday, 5 February)

FW: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)

FW: Reification thing questions Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)

Re: scope of parseType [was: Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-)] Dave Beckett (Tuesday, 5 February)

Re: datatyping summary Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)

Entailment versus implication Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)

Re: Reject change to rdf:value Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 5 February)

Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)

Re: Datatyping Summary Sergey Melnik (Monday, 4 February)

Re: For untidiness ... Sergey Melnik (Monday, 4 February)

Re: Monotonicity Sergey Melnik (Monday, 4 February)

Re: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? Sergey Melnik (Monday, 4 February)

first guess rdfr-theory [was:Re: reification test case] Jos De_Roo (Monday, 4 February)

Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f) Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)

Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Jeremy Carroll (Monday, 4 February)

Datatyping Summary V4 Brian McBride (Monday, 4 February)

reification test case Brian McBride (Sunday, 3 February)

why not take just the 2 ??? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Saturday, 2 February)

RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Friday, 1 February)

Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Sergey Melnik (Friday, 1 February)

Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Sergey Melnik (Friday, 1 February)

Datatyping, text case Graham Klyne (Friday, 1 February)

Re: Datatyping Summary V3 Graham Klyne (Friday, 1 February)

Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. Patrick Stickler (Friday, 1 February)

Re: Datatyping Summary V2 Patrick Stickler (Friday, 1 February)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 February 2002 16:57:07 UTC