w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from February 2002: by thread

a few questions about literals Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: a few questions about literals Dan Connolly (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: a few questions about literals Jos De_Roo (Thursday, 28 February)
Fwd: Addition to Pubrules: New Pubrules Checker Available Brian McBride (Wednesday, 27 February)
RE: possible way out of maze? [was: Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstan ding Issues ]] Ronald Daniel (Wednesday, 27 February)
Datatyping "code" for testing and consideration Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 27 February)
Datatyping Ontology Mike Dean (Tuesday, 26 February)
Minutes for 2002-02-22 RDF Core Telecon Aaron Swartz (Tuesday, 26 February)
revised datatyping proposal, now twopence colored Pat Hayes (Sunday, 24 February)
the S-B problem and what to do about it. Pat Hayes (Sunday, 24 February)
- Re: the S-B problem and what to do about it. Aaron Swartz (Sunday, 24 February)
  - Re: the S-B problem and what to do about it. Patrick Stickler (Monday, 25 February)
    - Adding lrange to the recent proposal (was: Re: the S-B problem and what to do about it.) Pat Hayes (Monday, 25 February)
- Re: the S-B problem and what to do about it. Brian McBride (Wednesday, 27 February)
revised datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Sunday, 24 February)
Some experimental CWM rules for datatyping idioms Patrick Stickler (Sunday, 24 February)
Four thousand words on datatyping... Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 23 February)
Re: dizzying datatypes discussions [was: Occam-slashed datatypes] Pat Hayes (Friday, 22 February)
Re: Test cases (entailment) ... Was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-22 Brian McBride (Friday, 22 February)
Occam-slashed datatypes Pat Hayes (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Patrick Stickler (Friday, 22 February)
  - Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Pat Hayes (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Patrick Stickler (Friday, 22 February)
  - Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Pat Hayes (Friday, 22 February)
    - Datatypes: unhappy of Bristol Jeremy Carroll (Saturday, 23 February)
    - Re: Datatypes: unhappy of Bristol Jos De_Roo (Saturday, 23 February)
    - Re: Datatypes: unhappy of Bristol Brian McBride (Sunday, 24 February)
    - Re: Datatypes: unhappy of Bristol Pat Hayes (Sunday, 24 February)
- Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Sergey Melnik (Friday, 22 February)
  - Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Patrick Stickler (Friday, 22 February)
Re: Even more simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Thursday, 21 February)
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-22 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Thursday, 21 February)
- Test cases (entailment) ... Was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-22 Jan Grant (Friday, 22 February)
Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Dave Beckett (Thursday, 21 February)
FW: Even more simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler (Thursday, 21 February)
- FW: Even more simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler (Thursday, 21 February)
- FW: Even more simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler (Thursday, 21 February)
answers to quiz (was: Re: simplified datatyping proposal) Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
- "Datatyping for Dummies" answers to quiz Patrick Stickler (Thursday, 21 February)
  - Re: "Datatyping for Dummies" answers to quiz Patrick Stickler (Thursday, 21 February)
telecon at the f2f Brian McBride (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: telecon at the f2f Frank Manola (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: telecon at the f2f Aaron Swartz (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: telecon at the f2f Eric Miller (Friday, 22 February)
weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: weekly call for agenda items Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: weekly call for agenda items Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
  - Re: weekly call for agenda items Frank Manola (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: weekly call for agenda items Frank Manola (Wednesday, 20 February)
Proposal for fragment identifiers in RDF Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 20 February)
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 20 February)
  - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 20 February)
  - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler (Thursday, 21 February)
    - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Thursday, 21 February)
  - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Graham Klyne (Thursday, 21 February)
    - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Thursday, 21 February)
    - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler (Thursday, 21 February)
    - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Thursday, 21 February)
    - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler (Friday, 22 February)
    - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Jos De_Roo (Wednesday, 20 February)
  - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 20 February)
  - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Jos De_Roo (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Jeremy Carroll (Thursday, 21 February)
  - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes (Thursday, 21 February)
  - Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Jos De_Roo (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Jos De_Roo (Thursday, 21 February)
A concern with the Datatyping proposal Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: A concern with the Datatyping proposal Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Brian McBride (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Jan Grant (Tuesday, 19 February)
XML Base - discussion + test cases Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: XML Base - discussion + test cases Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 19 February)
  - RE: XML Base - discussion + test cases Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 19 February)
    - RE: XML Base - discussion + test cases Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (Pat's questions) Aaron Swartz (Monday, 18 February)
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (Pat's questions) Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (Pat's questions) Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Jos De_Roo (Monday, 18 February)
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 19 February)
  - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 19 February)
    - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 20 February)
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Jos De_Roo (Monday, 18 February)
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (core issue) Aaron Swartz (Sunday, 17 February)
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (core issue) Pat Hayes (Monday, 18 February)
a theory of rdf:Bags Dan Connolly (Sunday, 17 February)
- Re: a theory of rdf:Bags Jos De_Roo (Sunday, 17 February)
- Re: a theory of rdf:Bags Pat Hayes (Monday, 18 February)
RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-15 Dave Beckett (Saturday, 16 February)
- Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-15 Dave Beckett (Saturday, 16 February)
- Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-15 Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 16 February)
Interpretation Use Cases for Datatyping (and Union to the rescue) Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 16 February)
Use case for tidy literal subjects (ignore if not interested) Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 16 February)
- Literal subjects can be tidy (was: Re: Use case for tidy literal subjects (ignore if not interested)) Pat Hayes (Monday, 18 February)
  - Re: Literal subjects can be tidy (was: Re: Use case for tidy literal subjects (ignore if not interested)) Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 19 February)
property formerly known as rdf:value Pat Hayes (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: property formerly known as rdf:value Brian McBride (Saturday, 16 February)
- Re: property formerly known as rdf:value Jos De_Roo (Saturday, 16 February)
  - Re: property formerly known as rdf:value Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 16 February)
  - Re: property formerly known as rdf:value Pat Hayes (Monday, 18 February)
- Re: property formerly known as rdf:value Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 16 February)
Concerns about reification Sergey Melnik (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: Concerns about reification Frank Manola (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: Concerns about reification Brian McBride (Tuesday, 19 February)
  - Re: Concerns about reification Frank Manola (Tuesday, 19 February)
    - Re: Concerns about reification Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
  - Re: Concerns about reification Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
Provenance usage scenario - releaseTime Ronald Daniel (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: Provenance usage scenario - releaseTime Frank Manola (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: Provenance usage scenario - releaseTime Graham Klyne (Friday, 15 February)
- RE: Provenance usage scenario - releaseTime Ronald Daniel (Saturday, 16 February)
Datatyping use cases Patrick Stickler (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: Datatyping use cases Brian McBride (Friday, 15 February)
  - Re: Datatyping use cases Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 16 February)
    - Datatyping namespaces (was: Re: Datatyping use cases) Pat Hayes (Monday, 18 February)
    - Re: Datatyping namespaces (was: Re: Datatyping use cases) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Monday, 18 February)
    - Re: Datatyping namespaces (was: Re: Datatyping use cases) Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 19 February)
    - Re: Datatyping namespaces (was: Re: Datatyping use cases) Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: Datatyping use cases Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 16 February)
  - Re: Datatyping use cases Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 16 February)
Exact ranges and using S-B Sergey Melnik (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: Exact ranges and using S-B Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 16 February)
  - Re: Exact ranges and using S-B Patrick Stickler (Sunday, 17 February)
regrets and reification Dan Brickley (Friday, 15 February)
entailment test cases and namespace entailment jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Friday, 15 February)
Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Brian McBride (Friday, 15 February)
  - Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Brian McBride (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Brian McBride (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 16 February)
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Dave Beckett (Friday, 15 February)
  - Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Brian McBride (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Dave Beckett (Friday, 15 February)
  - Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Brian McBride (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Dave Beckett (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Dave Beckett (Friday, 15 February)
  - Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Dave Beckett (Friday, 15 February)
  - Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler (Friday, 15 February)
  - More fun with xml:lang Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 16 February)
datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Pat Hayes (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Dan Connolly (Friday, 15 February)
  - Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Dan Connolly (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler (Friday, 15 February)
  - Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Pat Hayes (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 16 February)
    - Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Pat Hayes (Monday, 18 February)
    - Attempt to recap/summarize (was Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)) Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler (Friday, 15 February)
  - Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Pat Hayes (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 16 February)
- RE: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Ronald Daniel (Saturday, 16 February)
  - Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 16 February)
- around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Brian McBride (Monday, 18 February)
  - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Dan Connolly (Monday, 18 February)
    - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes (Monday, 18 February)
    - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Dan Connolly (Monday, 18 February)
    - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 19 February)
    - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 19 February)
    - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 19 February)
    - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Brian McBride (Tuesday, 19 February)
    - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 19 February)
  - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 19 February)
  - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Jan Grant (Tuesday, 19 February)
  - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Brian McBride (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - around and around and around the table [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Subtler simplified datatypes. Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: Subtler simplified datatypes. Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: Subtler simplified datatypes. Patrick Stickler (Thursday, 21 February)
    - Re: Subtler simplified datatypes. Patrick Stickler (Thursday, 21 February)
    - "Datatyping for Dummies" (or Occam's Razor Slash Fest) Patrick Stickler (Thursday, 21 February)
    - Re: "Datatyping for Dummies" (or Occam's Razor Slash Fest) Pat Hayes (Thursday, 21 February)
    - Re: "Datatyping for Dummies" (or Occam's Razor Slash Fest) Patrick Stickler (Friday, 22 February)
    - Re: "Datatyping for Dummies" (or Occam's Razor Slash Fest) Pat Hayes (Friday, 22 February)
    - Re: "Datatyping for Dummies" (or Occam's Razor Slash Fest) Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 23 February)
    - Re: Subtler simplified datatypes. Pat Hayes (Thursday, 21 February)
Datatyping Graham Klyne (Thursday, 14 February)
happy valentines day, New RDF Model Theory Working Draft published Eric Miller (Thursday, 14 February)
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Thursday, 14 February)
- URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz (Thursday, 14 February)
  - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Brian McBride (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Patrick Stickler (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Brian McBride (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz (Sunday, 17 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Brian McBride (Monday, 18 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz (Monday, 18 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Pat Hayes (Monday, 18 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (issue background) Aaron Swartz (Tuesday, 19 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Dan Brickley (Tuesday, 19 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Pat Hayes (Monday, 18 February)
  - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Dan Connolly (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Graham Klyne (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Dan Connolly (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Pat Hayes (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz (Friday, 15 February)
  - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Pat Hayes (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Dan Connolly (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Pat Hayes (Friday, 15 February)
  - Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Dave Beckett (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15 Dan Connolly (Thursday, 14 February)
  - Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15 Patrick Stickler (Friday, 15 February)
  - Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15 Brian McBride (Friday, 15 February)
ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Brian McBride (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Frank Manola (Thursday, 14 February)
  - Re: ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Brian McBride (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Frank Manola (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Pat Hayes (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Jos De_Roo (Thursday, 14 February)
call for agenda items Brian McBride (Wednesday, 13 February)
F2F Objectives and Agenda Brian McBride (Tuesday, 12 February)
A collection of issue resolutions Brian McBride (Tuesday, 12 February)
- rdfms-uri-substructure: some clarifying advice [was: A collection of issue resolutions] Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 12 February)
  - Re: rdfms-uri-substructure: some clarifying advice [was: A collection of issue resolutions] Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 12 February)
  - Re: rdfms-uri-substructure: some clarifying advice [was: A collection of issue resolutions] Brian McBride (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: rdfms-uri-substructure: some clarifying advice [was: A collection of issue resolutions] Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: A collection of issue resolutions Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 13 February)
  - Re: A collection of issue resolutions Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 13 February)
  - Re: A collection of issue resolutions Brian McBride (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: A collection of issue resolutions Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: A collection of issue resolutions Brian McBride (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: A collection of issue resolutions Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: A collection of issue resolutions Patrick Stickler (Thursday, 14 February)
  - Re: A collection of issue resolutions Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: A collection of issue resolutions Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 13 February)
  - Re: A collection of issue resolutions Brian McBride (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: A collection of issue resolutions Dave Beckett (Thursday, 14 February)
Reification: proposed resolution Brian McBride (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: Reification: proposed resolution Jos De_Roo (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: Reification: proposed resolution Frank Manola (Tuesday, 12 February)
  - Re: Reification: proposed resolution Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 13 February)
  - Re: Reification: proposed resolution Brian McBride (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: Reification: proposed resolution Frank Manola (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: Reification: proposed resolution Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: Reification: proposed resolution Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 13 February)
  - reification "subagenda" Frank Manola (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: reification "subagenda" Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: reification "subagenda" Brian McBride (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: reification "subagenda" Graham Klyne (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: reification "subagenda" Dan Connolly (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: reification "subagenda" Jan Grant (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: reification "subagenda" Graham Klyne (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: reification "subagenda" Frank Manola (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: reification "subagenda" Pat Hayes (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: reification "subagenda" Pat Hayes (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: reification "subagenda" Brian McBride (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: reification "subagenda" Frank Manola (Thursday, 14 February)
    - linking reification to reified (was: Re: reification "subagenda") Pat Hayes (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: linking reification to reified (was: Re: reification "subagenda") Graham Klyne (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: Reification: proposed resolution Graham Klyne (Thursday, 14 February)
rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure [was Re: Outstanding Issues] Dave Beckett (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure [was Re: Outstanding Issues] Patrick Stickler (Monday, 11 February)
xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Dave Beckett (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride (Monday, 11 February)
  - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler (Monday, 11 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride (Monday, 11 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Bill de hÓra (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 27 February)
    - RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Bill de hÓra (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Bill de hÓra (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Bill de hÓra (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 27 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 27 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 27 February)
  - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 27 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 12 February)
  - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Frank Manola (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Frank Manola (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Frank Manola (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Martyn Horner (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Frank Manola (Thursday, 14 February)
    - migrating from M&S Bill de hÓra (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: migrating from M&S Frank Manola (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - possible way out of maze? [was: Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ]] Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 27 February)
    - RE: possible way out of maze? [was: Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ]] Bill de hÓra (Wednesday, 27 February)
    - Re: possible way out of maze? [was: Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ]] Brian McBride (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Jos De_Roo (Tuesday, 12 February)
- RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Ronald Daniel (Tuesday, 12 February)
  - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Dave Beckett (Wednesday, 13 February)
  - Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Jos De_Roo (Wednesday, 27 February)
Outstanding Issues Brian McBride (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: Outstanding Issues Patrick Stickler (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: Outstanding Issues Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 12 February)
  - Re: Outstanding Issues Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Outstanding Issues Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 13 February)
  - Re: Outstanding Issues Brian McBride (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Outstanding Issues Brian McBride (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Outstanding Issues Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: Outstanding Issues Brian McBride (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 19 February)
    - Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Frank Manola (Tuesday, 19 February)
    - Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 19 February)
    - Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Dan Brickley (Tuesday, 19 February)
    - Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Frank Manola (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: Outstanding Issues Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 13 February)
  - rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure, again [was: Outstanding Issues] Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure, again [was: Outstanding Issues] Patrick Stickler (Thursday, 14 February)
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr: Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 20 February)
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 20 February)
  - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com (Thursday, 21 February)
    - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Brian McBride (Thursday, 21 February)
    - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Jeremy Carroll (Friday, 22 February)
  - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com (Thursday, 21 February)
    - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Jeremy Carroll (Friday, 22 February)
  - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com (Friday, 22 February)
    - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Jeremy Carroll (Saturday, 23 February)
    - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Brian McBride (Sunday, 24 February)
  - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com (Saturday, 23 February)
    - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Pat Hayes (Sunday, 24 February)
    - Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang John Cowan (Monday, 25 February)
    - Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Mark Davis (Monday, 25 February)
    - Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Martin Duerst (Wednesday, 27 February)
    - Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang John Cowan (Wednesday, 27 February)
    - Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Brian McBride (Thursday, 28 February)
  - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com (Sunday, 24 February)
    - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Pat Hayes (Sunday, 24 February)
  - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com (Sunday, 24 February)
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 20 February)
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-seq-representation Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 20 February)
  - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-seq-representation Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-seq-representation Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-seq-representation Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-seq-representation Brian McBride (Wednesday, 20 February)
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdf-charmod-literals Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 20 February)
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdf-charmod-uris Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 20 February)
doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Sunday, 10 February)
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Brian McBride (Sunday, 10 February)
  - Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Dan Brickley (Sunday, 10 February)
    - Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Brian McBride (Sunday, 10 February)
    - Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Graham Klyne (Sunday, 10 February)
  - Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Sergey Melnik (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Frank Manola (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Brian McBride (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Frank Manola (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Pat Hayes (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Brian McBride (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Sergey Melnik (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Graham Klyne (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Jos De_Roo (Sunday, 10 February)
  - Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Patrick Stickler (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Patrick Stickler (Monday, 11 February)
simple entailment testcase [Was: Re: reification test case] jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Friday, 8 February)
One final step to datatyping convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler (Friday, 8 February)
- Re: One final step to datatyping convergence and closure? Pat Hayes (Saturday, 9 February)
  - Re: One final step to datatyping convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: One final step to datatyping convergence and closure? Jos De_Roo (Sunday, 10 February)
Minutes, 2002-02-08 teleconference Graham Klyne (Friday, 8 February)
BagID issue link Jeremy Carroll (Friday, 8 February)
- Re: BagID issue link Brian McBride (Sunday, 10 February)
  - Re: BagID issue link Patrick Stickler (Monday, 11 February)
  - Re: BagID issue link Pat Hayes (Monday, 11 February)
BagID issue link Jeremy Carroll (Friday, 8 February)
Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable) Brian McBride (Friday, 8 February)
- Re: Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable) Jos De_Roo (Friday, 8 February)
- Re: Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable) patrick.stickler@nokia.com (Friday, 8 February)
  - Re: Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable) Brian McBride (Friday, 8 February)
    - Re: Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable) Patrick Stickler (Saturday, 9 February)
MT publication, dropped ball Dan Brickley (Friday, 8 February)
Some words about formal semantics Graham Klyne (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: Some words about formal semantics Frank Manola (Thursday, 7 February)
  - Re: Some words about formal semantics Graham Klyne (Thursday, 7 February)
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-08 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Thursday, 7 February)
- new Primer draft Frank Manola (Thursday, 7 February)
  - reification decision process intro Frank Manola (Thursday, 7 February)
    - Re: reification decision process intro Jos De_Roo (Friday, 8 February)
    - Re: reification decision process intro Frank Manola (Friday, 8 February)
    - Re: reification decision process intro Brian McBride (Friday, 8 February)
    - Re: reification decision process intro Pat Hayes (Friday, 8 February)
    - Re: reification decision process intro jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Friday, 8 February)
    - Re: reification decision process intro Jos De_Roo (Friday, 8 February)
    - Re: reification decision process intro Frank Manola (Friday, 8 February)
RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Ronald Daniel (Thursday, 7 February)
Dublin Core and multiple element concerns Dave Beckett (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concerns Brian McBride (Thursday, 7 February)
  - Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concerns Dan Connolly (Friday, 8 February)
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concerns Jeremy Carroll (Friday, 8 February)
Dublin Core and multiple element concern Dave Beckett (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Brian McBride (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Dave Beckett (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Pat Hayes (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Dave Beckett (Thursday, 7 February)
  - Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern patrick.stickler@nokia.com (Friday, 8 February)
    - Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Pat Hayes (Monday, 11 February)
    - Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Patrick Stickler (Monday, 11 February)
    - Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 12 February)
- RE: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Ronald Daniel (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Brian McBride (Thursday, 7 February)
- RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Eric Miller (Thursday, 7 February)
  - Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] patrick.stickler@nokia.com (Thursday, 7 February)
- Datatyping and idioms Graham Klyne (Thursday, 7 February)
  - Re: Datatyping and idioms patrick.stickler@nokia.com (Friday, 8 February)
    - Re: Datatyping and idioms Graham Klyne (Friday, 8 February)
Fwd: Connectivity at the Tech Plenary Brian McBride (Thursday, 7 February)
Datatypes Convergence Brian McBride (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: Datatypes Convergence Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 6 February)
  - Re: Datatypes Convergence Brian McBride (Thursday, 7 February)
    - Re: Datatypes Convergence patrick.stickler@nokia.com (Thursday, 7 February)
    - Re: Datatypes Convergence patrick.stickler@nokia.com (Friday, 8 February)
- Re: Datatypes Convergence Daniel W. Connolly (Wednesday, 6 February)
  - Re: Datatypes Convergence Daniel W. Connolly (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: Datatypes Convergence Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 6 February)
  - Re: Datatypes Convergence Brian McBride (Wednesday, 6 February)
ACTION 2002-01-24#4 responses on datatyping Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: ACTION 2002-01-24#4 responses on datatyping Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 6 February)
summary of reification? Sergey Melnik (Tuesday, 5 February)
- Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 6 February)
  - Re: summary of reification? Brian McBride (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: summary of reification? Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: summary of reification? Graham Klyne (Thursday, 7 February)
  - Re: summary of reification? Sergey Melnik (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: summary of reification? Sergey Melnik (Wednesday, 6 February)
  - Re: summary of reification? Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: summary of reification? Graham Klyne (Thursday, 7 February)
    - Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes (Thursday, 7 February)
    - Re: summary of reification? Brian McBride (Thursday, 7 February)
    - RE: summary of reification? Jeremy Carroll (Thursday, 7 February)
    - RE: summary of reification? Jeremy Carroll (Thursday, 7 February)
    - RE: summary of reification? Brian McBride (Thursday, 7 February)
    - RE: summary of reification? Jeremy Carroll (Thursday, 7 February)
    - Re: summary of reification? Frank Manola (Thursday, 7 February)
    - Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: summary of reification? Jos De_Roo (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: summary of reification? Jos De_Roo (Thursday, 7 February)
  - Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: PRISM and multiple element concern - CORRECTION Ronald Daniel (Tuesday, 5 February)
RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Ronald Daniel (Tuesday, 5 February)
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
PRISM and multiple element concern Ronald Daniel (Tuesday, 5 February)
- Re: PRISM and multiple element concern Brian McBride (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: PRISM and multiple element concern Brian McBride (Thursday, 7 February)
  - Re: PRISM and multiple element concern Pat Hayes (Thursday, 7 February)
FW: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
FW: Reification thing questions Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: scope of parseType [was: Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-)] Dave Beckett (Tuesday, 5 February)
- Re: scope of parseType [was: Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-)] Dave Beckett (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: datatyping summary Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
Entailment versus implication Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
- Re: Entailment versus implication Pat Hayes (Monday, 11 February)
  - Re: Entailment versus implication Patrick Stickler (Monday, 11 February)
    - Re: Entailment versus implication Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 13 February)
Re: Reject change to rdf:value Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)
Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
  - Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 6 February)
- RE: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 5 February)
  - RE: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: Datatyping Summary Sergey Melnik (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: Datatyping Summary Sergey Melnik (Monday, 4 February)
  - A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - RE: A basis for convergence and closure? Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - RE: A basis for convergence and closure? Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - RE: A basis for convergence and closure? Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Sergey Melnik (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Brian McBride (Thursday, 7 February)
    - Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Pat Hayes (Thursday, 7 February)
    - type/dtype/subclassing and range/subproperties Graham Klyne (Thursday, 7 February)
    - Re: type/dtype/subclassing and range/subproperties patrick.stickler@nokia.com (Friday, 8 February)
    - Re: type/dtype/subclassing and range/subproperties Jos De_Roo (Friday, 8 February)
    - Re: type/dtype/subclassing and range/subproperties Pat Hayes (Monday, 11 February)
    - Re: A basis for convergence and closure? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Jos De_Roo (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: Datatyping Summary Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: For untidiness ... Sergey Melnik (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: For untidiness ... Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
Re: Monotonicity Sergey Melnik (Monday, 4 February)
- RE: Monotonicity Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 5 February)
  - Re: Monotonicity Sergey Melnik (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? Sergey Melnik (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
first guess rdfr-theory [was:Re: reification test case] Jos De_Roo (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: first guess rdfr-theory [was:Re: reification test case] Graham Klyne (Monday, 4 February)
Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f) Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f) Brian McBride (Tuesday, 5 February)
  - Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f) Pat Hayes (Monday, 11 February)
    - Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f) Brian McBride (Monday, 11 February)
    - Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f) Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - to pull or not to pull [was: Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f)] Brian McBride (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: to pull or not to pull [was: Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f)] Patrick Stickler (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: to pull or not to pull [was: Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f)] Pat Hayes (Thursday, 14 February)
Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Jeremy Carroll (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
  - RE: Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Jeremy Carroll (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
  - RE: Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Jeremy Carroll (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
Datatyping Summary V4 Brian McBride (Monday, 4 February)
- RE: Datatyping Summary V4 Jeremy Carroll (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
  - Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Brian McBride (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
    - RE: Datatyping Summary V4 Jeremy Carroll (Monday, 4 February)
    - RE: Datatyping Summary V4 Brian McBride (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Graham Klyne (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Brian McBride (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
- why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Dan Connolly (Monday, 4 February)
  - Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Graham Klyne (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Graham Klyne (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Jos De_Roo (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
  - Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Brian McBride (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - B5 storage: why did it go away? [was: why S...] Daniel W. Connolly (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Daniel W. Connolly (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Sergey Melnik (Monday, 4 February)
  - Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Sergey Melnik (Tuesday, 5 February)
reification test case Brian McBride (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: reification test case Frank Manola (Sunday, 3 February)
  - Re: reification test case Dan Brickley (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: reification test case jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Sunday, 3 February)
  - Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
  - Re: reification test case Graham Klyne (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: reification test case Graham Klyne (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: reification test case Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)
  - Re: reification test case Brian McBride (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: reification test case Martyn Horner (Monday, 4 February)
    - RE: reification test case Jeremy Carroll (Monday, 4 February)
    - RE: reification test case Dan Connolly (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: reification test case Dan Brickley (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: reification test case Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: reification test case Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - RE: reification test case Bill de hÓra (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: reification test case Dan Connolly (Monday, 4 February)
    - RE: reification test case Jeremy Carroll (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: reification test case Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)
    - Reification puzzles (was: RE: reification test case) Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)
    - RE: Reification puzzles (was: RE: reification test case) Bill de hÓra (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: Reification puzzles (was: RE: reification test case) Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - RE: Reification puzzles (was: RE: reification test case) Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: Reification puzzles (was: RE: reification test case) Jos De_Roo (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - RE: reification test case Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)
  - Re: reification test case Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
  - Model theory for b-nodes [was: Re: reification test case] Brian McBride (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: Model theory for b-nodes [was: Re: reification test case] Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: reification test case jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Monday, 4 February)
  - Re: reification test case Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: reification test case Jos De_Roo (Monday, 4 February)
  - Re: reification test case Dan Brickley (Monday, 4 February)
  - Re: reification test case Brian McBride (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: reification test case Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)
    - Reification thing questions (was: Re: reification test case) Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)
  - Identity of things (was: Re: reification test case) Pat Hayes (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: reification test case Jos De_Roo (Monday, 4 February)
- RE: reification test case Bill de hÓra (Tuesday, 5 February)
- Re: reification test case Jos De_Roo (Tuesday, 5 February)
  - Re: reification test case Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: reification test case jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Wednesday, 6 February)
why not take just the 2 ??? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Saturday, 2 February)
- Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: why not take just the 2 ??? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: why not take just the 2 ??? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
  - Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: why not take just the 2 ??? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Monday, 4 February)
  - Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Friday, 1 February)
- Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Dan Connolly (Friday, 1 February)
  - Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Brian McBride (Sunday, 3 February)
    - Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Frank Manola (Sunday, 3 February)
- Primer status and Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Frank Manola (Saturday, 2 February)
  - Re: Primer status and Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Graham Klyne (Sunday, 3 February)
    - Re: Primer status and Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Frank Manola (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Brian McBride (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Brian McBride (Thursday, 7 February)
  - Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Dan Brickley (Friday, 8 February)
- Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Brian McBride (Thursday, 7 February)
Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Sergey Melnik (Friday, 1 February)
- Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Dave Beckett (Tuesday, 5 February)
  - RE: Datatypes and xml:lang Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Patrick Stickler (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 6 February)
Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Sergey Melnik (Friday, 1 February)
- Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Patrick Stickler (Sunday, 3 February)
  - Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Sergey Melnik (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Brian McBride (Monday, 4 February)
  - Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Sergey Melnik (Monday, 4 February)
  - Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Graham Klyne (Monday, 4 February)
    - Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Sergey Melnik (Tuesday, 5 February)
Datatyping, text case Graham Klyne (Friday, 1 February)
- RE: Datatyping, text case Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: Datatyping Summary V3 Graham Klyne (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. Patrick Stickler (Friday, 1 February)
- Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. Graham Klyne (Friday, 1 February)
- Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Friday, 1 February)
  - Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. Graham Klyne (Friday, 1 February)
- Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. Sergey Melnik (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Datatyping Summary V2 Patrick Stickler (Friday, 1 February)

w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from February 2002 by thread