W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:43:41 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020214144139.0231ed60@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>, Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
Cc: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 17:32 13/02/2002 -0500, Frank Manola wrote:
[...]
>>I think this decision effectively makes rdf:subject etc. vocabulary
>>useless, i.e. not having any special meaning (I believe Pat made this
>>point earlier). In other words, 4-triple reification becomes effectively
>>deprecated (which is fine with me).

I disagree.  It works just fine, in either Statement or Stating 
interpretation for my use of it in the P3P schema.


>How about adding a straw poll on the last sentence to the reification 
>subagenda?

We already decided not to shoot it.  Please move forwards, not backwards.

Brian
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 09:45:13 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:11 EDT