At 13:20 15/02/2002 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote: >On 2002-02-15 12:52, "ext Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk> wrote: > > > > Those bits of syntax generate different ntriples and if you want the > > latter to be the same as the former, parser changes will be needed. > >No. They *should* generate different triples, since they are >different idioms. Their equivalence is logical, not syntactic. agreed. BReceived on Friday, 15 February 2002 09:01:18 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:13 EDT