W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)]

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:28:25 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020219142452.00a977e8@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 10:25 19/02/2002 +0000, Jan Grant wrote:
[...]

> >    o Are there features that could be dropped and
> >      still meet the needs of your users? (Which?)
>
>Of the datatyping options presented, I prefer the doublet approach, for
>what it's worth.

Does that mean:

   1 you could drop the datatype triple
   2 you could drop either the doublet or the datatype tripple
     and would prefer to drop the triple
   3 none of the above (please clarify)



> >    o Does the proposal 'work for you'?
>
>As clean as the resulting MT may be, I still find this construction
>ugly.

This construction?

Brian
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 09:29:51 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:16 EDT