Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)]

At 10:25 19/02/2002 +0000, Jan Grant wrote:
[...]

> >    o Are there features that could be dropped and
> >      still meet the needs of your users? (Which?)
>
>Of the datatyping options presented, I prefer the doublet approach, for
>what it's worth.

Does that mean:

   1 you could drop the datatype triple
   2 you could drop either the doublet or the datatype tripple
     and would prefer to drop the triple
   3 none of the above (please clarify)



> >    o Does the proposal 'work for you'?
>
>As clean as the resulting MT may be, I still find this construction
>ugly.

This construction?

Brian