W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

RE: reification test case

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 04 Feb 2002 09:23:40 -0600
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com, Brian McBride <brian_mcbride@hp.com>, RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1012836225.1656.20.camel@dirk>
On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 07:12, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> My vote: no.

I vote yes.

This is what "triple" means, after all, no?
if x=xx, y=yy, z=zz, then (x,y,z)=(xx,yy,zz), no?


| There is a set called Statements, each element of which is a
| triple of the form
|
| {pred, sub, obj}
  -- http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/#model

If we're not going to take the implications of reification
seriously, let's just throw it out.


> > -----Original Message-----
> > Does
> > >  <stmt1> <rdf:type>      <rdf:Statement> .
> > >  <stmt1> <rdf:subject>   <subject> .
> > >  <stmt1> <rdf:predicate> <predicate> .
> > >  <stmt1> <rdf:object>    <object> .
> > >
> > >  <stmt2> <rdf:type>      <rdf:Statement> .
> > >  <stmt2> <rdf:subject>   <subject> .
> > >  <stmt2> <rdf:predicate> <predicate> .
> > >  <stmt2> <rdf:object>    <object> .
> > >
> > >  <stmt1> <property>      <foo> .
> > >
> > >  entail:
> > >
> > >  <stmt2> <property>      <foo> .
> > 
> > 
> > Brian

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 10:24:55 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:03 EDT