- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:37:12 +0100
- To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
for a stating, I could live with <stmt1> <rdf:type> <rdf:Statement> . <stmt1> <rdf:subject> _:a1 . _:a1 <log:quote> <subject> . <stmt1> <rdf:predicate> <predicate> . <stmt1> <rdf:object> _:b1 . _:b1 <log:quote> <object> . <stmt2> <rdf:type> <rdf:Statement> . <stmt2> <rdf:subject> _:a2 . _:a2 <log:quote> <subject> . <stmt2> <rdf:predicate> <predicate> . <stmt2> <rdf:object> _:b2 . _:b2 <log:quote> <object> . <stmt1> <property> <foo> . does *not* entail: <stmt2> <property> <foo> . maybe <fru>st<r>ating, isn't it? -- Jos
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2002 16:37:51 UTC