W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: Reification: proposed resolution

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:37:12 +0100
To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF70FC0D15.34501102-ON41256B5E.0074A5AF@agfa.be>

for a stating, I could live with

   <stmt1> <rdf:type> <rdf:Statement> .
   <stmt1> <rdf:subject> _:a1 .
   _:a1 <log:quote> <subject> .
   <stmt1> <rdf:predicate> <predicate> .
   <stmt1> <rdf:object> _:b1 .
   _:b1 <log:quote> <object> .

   <stmt2> <rdf:type> <rdf:Statement> .
   <stmt2> <rdf:subject> _:a2 .
   _:a2 <log:quote> <subject> .
   <stmt2> <rdf:predicate> <predicate> .
   <stmt2> <rdf:object> _:b2 .
   _:b2 <log:quote> <object> .

   <stmt1> <property> <foo> .

 does *not* entail:

   <stmt2> <property> <foo> .

maybe <fru>st<r>ating, isn't it?

--
Jos
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2002 16:37:51 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:09 EDT