- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 14 Feb 2002 22:59:51 -0600
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 11:21, Graham Klyne wrote: > 1. I agree that M&S allows only one statement with given sub, pred, obj. > > 2. M&S may not specifically admit more than one reification of a statement, > but it also does not (to me) clearly deny the possibility. Hmm... that's an angle I hadn't considered. But how do you reconcile point 2. with text like A statement and its corresponding reified statement ? That's pretty clear that they're in 1-1 correspondence, no? I'm still trying to decide whether I care enough to go on record as opposing this decision. I think the argument we made for removing aboutEachPrefix applies pretty well to reification. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 23:59:26 UTC