Hi Brian, > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian McBride [mailto:bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com] > > >1) literals can't have properties, but we find xml:lang in > the syntax > >very handy, so we made it part of a literal. > > > >2) it means not a property of. > > I'm not sure I'd go that far. I'd have no problems with cwm, > for example, > allowing literals as subjects and making the lang a property. I have no problem with cwm doing that; imo cwm's there to stretch the envelope a bit. Otherwise literals as subjects isn't RDF. [the answers I gave are somewhat sarky, but I believe contain more than grain of truth] Bill de hÓraReceived on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 08:51:41 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:10 EDT