Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)]

[...]

>   o Does the datatyping proposal meet your
>     needs and the needs of your users?
>     (Who are they?) (What is missing?)

yes
resolving S-B is needed

>   o Are there features that could be dropped and
>     still meet the needs of your users? (Which?)

as Dan said, doublets, but I can also live with them

>   o Does the proposal 'work for you'?

as far as our testcases go, yes

>   o Are there any concerns with the proposal
>     you would like to raise? (What are they?)

not for the moment
(except the exact namespace:names)

--
Jos