>On 2002-02-15 4:20 AM, "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > >>> Sure, I came up with a proposal for this once, but I recall it being >>> dismissed as crazily strange. I'd have no problem with that. >>> >>> http://example.org/foo#bar >>> -> >>> http://example.org/foo?frag=bar >>> or maybe >>> http://www.w3.org/2002/02-frag/?uri=http://example.org/foo&frag=bar >> Does that mean you agree that http://example.org/foo#bar does name >>a resource? > >Of course! I don't think anyone disagrees with that. The issue at hand is >whether we can define it as naming an abstract resource. ?? What is an abstract resource? Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayesReceived on Monday, 18 February 2002 17:18:56 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:15 EDT