W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15)

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:19:06 -0600
Message-Id: <p05101402b8972e3bdd88@[65.212.118.219]>
To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>On 2002-02-15 4:20 AM, "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>
>>>  Sure, I came up with a proposal for this once, but I recall it being
>>>  dismissed as crazily strange. I'd have no problem with that.
>>>
>>>  http://example.org/foo#bar
>>>   ->
>>>   http://example.org/foo?frag=bar
>>>   or maybe
>>>   http://www.w3.org/2002/02-frag/?uri=http://example.org/foo&frag=bar
>>  Does that mean you agree that http://example.org/foo#bar does name 
>>a resource?
>
>Of course! I don't think anyone disagrees with that. The issue at hand is
>whether we can define it as naming an abstract resource.

?? What is an abstract resource?

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Monday, 18 February 2002 17:18:56 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:15 EDT